HEAD Speed Tour Review
For 2026, Head introduces a completely new model to its Speed line with the Speed Tour. Players can expect tons of dialed-in control and a plush feel from its 97-square-inch head and 61 stiffness rating, but what stood out most for our testers was its spin potential. The Speed Tour features a slightly open 16x19 string pattern and an average swingweight in the mid-320 range, which allows for easy racquet head speed and tons of spin. The racquet also uses Hy-Bor technology, with boron fibers in the shaft for added stability and a connected feel through impact. With the intent of further optimizing the feel and response, Head includes Auxetic 2.0 as well. While the featured technologies sound impressive, it was the specs of the Speed Tour that really had our playtesters champing at the bit to get on a court. Our team was very impressed with this racquet by the end of the playtest, and even went on to say that this may be the most spin-oriented 97-square-inch frame on the market today. Our testers agreed that the Speed Tour is a great addition to the Speed family. Players who enjoy taking larger cuts at the ball will value the extra control and spin, as will fine-touch players looking to hit droppers from anywhere on the court.
- Spin potential
- Control
- No shared dislikes
Final Verdict
Breakdown
Groundstrokes: 8.8
Our playtesters were genuinely surprised by the amount of spin they were getting from the Speed Tour’s 97-square-inch head. Munish was enamored with this aspect of the racquet, and he found it great for hitting angled shots. He said, "I loved this racquet on my groundstrokes. I felt like I could hit the ball anywhere from the baseline. Generating spin wasn't difficult, and because of the lower powered nature of the racquet, I could take full swings at the ball and not worry about it going out. The weight of the racquet keeps it very stable while still being just light enough for me to add tons of racquet head speed with ease. I thought the Speed Tour fit my game extremely well."
Mark took full advantage of the Speed Tour’s balance and open string pattern to be a lot more aggressive on his forehand side. He explained, "The 11.4-ounce Speed Tour struck a nice balance of stability and agility, making groundstroke depth easy to develop and my angled shots out wide easy to gauge. Stability was not often an issue from the baseline even if contact was slightly off center, and my directional control allowed me to stay on target. Slice was equally easy to tap into without having to change my approach. It is worth mentioning that although my forehand is usually my more powerful and less reliable wing from the backcourt, I was a little more aggressive and consistent on my forehand with the Speed Tour than I am with my own racquet."
"The string spacing of the 16x19 pattern paired with the 97-square-inch head to pocket the ball nicely and make accessing topspin easy."
The Speed Tour enabled Chris to get more rotation on the ball than he gets from his beloved Speed Pro. He said, "I was impressed with the spin I got on my shots with this Speed Tour. Both my topspin and slice shots were coming off the racquet with some extra RPMs. I was also very happy with the pace I could generate. I felt like I was getting a little more weight on the ball, especially with my topspin backhand. The racquet felt very solid on big swings and stable on more compact strokes. I did lose a little consistency compared to hitting with my regular racquet, and also compared to the Speed Pro, but I feel that would come back with more time. I was feeling more dialed in at the end of the month-long test, but I still felt like I could be more consistent. Like the other new Speed racquets, this Tour model also sounds great, with a very pleasing 'thwack' generated off a medium to fast swing."
Troy appreciated that the Speed Tour gave him a solid feel and plow through while still being maneuverable enough to add tons of racquet head speed for heavy topspin shots. He said, "I found this Speed Tour to feel pretty solid on contact when I was hitting from the baseline. With the 16x19 pattern, I was able to shape my groundstrokes with easy spin and net clearance. I really noticed how easy it was to shape my forehand and hit with heavy topspin. I had pretty good control on the backhand slice, feeling like I could place the ball well and keep it low off the bounce. In terms of plow through, there was a noticeable amount of mass to help me hit through the ball. I wouldn't say it felt too clubby, but | might weight this racquet up a bit in the handle to make it feel a bit more head light."
Volleys: 8.5
The highlights of the Speed Tour at the net were its maneuverability and solid feel. They allowed our testers to not only finish off points quickly, but also add some more creative flair to their shots. This was particularly the case for Chris, who found great feel and stability from the Speed Tour. He described, "I loved the response of this racquet at net. The Speed Tour felt easy to get into position, and I found myself being very creative with my shots. I liked the feel at impact. On volleys, the racquet felt comfortable and lively, and it offered a good sense of depth and direction. My drop volleys were working well because the racquet offered enough stability to allow me to relax and get maximum feel. I was also able to tap into the racquet's spin potential on volleys. When cutting under the ball, I was able to generate a low-skidding shot that was tough for my opponents to dig out."
Similarly, Munish was able to add variety to his net game with penetrating low balls and a sneaky drop shot. He said, "The net is where this racquet shone the most for me, and I was thoroughly impressed by my approach shots as well. The racquet's maneuverability and launch angle worked really well together, so I didn't have to do much to hit a strong and effective approach. I loved the feel of the racquet at net, and it allowed me to hit some great drop shots and angled volleys."
"I could vary my volleys and keep my opponent guessing, but I could also finish points whenever possible with ample power and plow through."
The Speed Tour surprised Mark with how much controllable power he was getting at the net. He said, "I have to say that for a racquet with a low 60 RA, the Speed Tour felt responsive at net. Whether I was short-hopping a half volley or defending a passing shot at net, I felt like I was getting good dwell time for control along with a manageable return of energy to the ball."
Troy found the Speed Tour to be the most control-oriented Speed model he’s tried, but he still found it to be quite powerful for a 97-square-inch head sized frame. He said, "One thing that stood out for me when hitting volleys was that this Speed Tour 2026 felt more precise than other Speed racquets I have tried in the past (since they were all 100 head size). I felt like I could place the ball and hit my spots when trying to close out the point. There was also a pretty good amount of stability on contact and pop on my volleys. The beam width is a bit thicker than most 97 head size racquets on the market. I think this helped with energy return and stability on my volleys. It also added a crisper feel to the racquet, and I thought the feel was a bit firmer than the low-60s stiffness rating might indicate."
Serves: 8.4
The Speed Tour offered our playtesters a beautiful blend of controllable power and heavy spin on their serves. This allowed Chris to confidently take bigger cuts at the ball. He said, "The Speed Tour was a fun racquet on serve for me. I was able to generate decent pace and spin while also being happy with my consistency. My slice serve was working well, and I felt very confident being aggressive with my slice on both first and second serves. The comfort level of the racquet continued to impress me. I found a nice and solid feel at impact. For me, the Speed Tour offered just enough plow-through power without ever feeling too tiring to swing during long service games."
Mark complimented the accuracy of the Speed Tour, along with its ability to make his first serve a bigger weapon. He said, "I was comfortable serving with the new Speed Tour after just a few practice serves. I wasn’t tearing the cover off the ball, but that same spin-friendliness from the baseline had a great effect on my serve. Pace was decent and placement was even better, making my first serve pretty effective. Serving to the body or out wide on the ad side is what I excel at, and the Speed Tour definitely catered to that."
Troy's serves depend heavily on kick and accuracy, and the Speed Tour fit his service game perfectly. He explained, "I found a good amount of precision and spin on my serves. However, with that thicker beam width (say compared to a Head Prestige Pro 16x19), I was finding some nice pop on the ball, which is not always the case with a 97 head size. I was especially noticing this on my flat serve; it felt like the ball was coming off the racquet with some extra zip. My bread and butter when serving is being able to hit my targets and generating a lot of spin and kick on the ball. I felt like this Head Speed Tour 2026 helped me to execute that well."
Despite getting fewer free points on serve than he usually does, Munish was still able to hit very effective first serves and heavy kick second serves with the Speed Tour. He said, "Some of my stronger first serves that are usually aces were coming back, but that's also something that happens when I playtest control racquets. It wasn't too bad because I was getting pinpoint accuracy from the Speed Tour, so my serves were still effective even though they weren't as powerful. Second serves were mostly kick serves because I wanted to fully take advantage of the spin potential and maneuverability of the Speed Tour. This was also fairly effective, but some of the playtesters were able to tee off on their returns because my second serve wasn't very fast or powerful."
Returns: 8.3
The launch angle and the smaller head size of the Speed Tour encouraged our playtesters to attack weaker serves, while the mid-320s swingweight provided enough stability to block back serves that had more pace. Munish often chipped first serves back deep, and on second serve returns he could step in, swing bigger and stay consistent thanks to the Speed Tour's control. He described, "Most first serve returns were chips deep into the center of the court. I struggled with blocking the ball back against bigger servers, and my ball often landed short, which they could take advantage of. Returning second serves was very different; I could be a lot more aggressive and hit the ball on the rise. I was taking bigger swings and still keeping the ball in due to the amazing control of the Speed Tour."
Chris could hit his returns with plenty of depth and plenty of spin. He said, "I was able to hit some very aggressive returns with the Speed Tour. I liked the way the racquet felt through my swing: fast, yet solid at impact. The stringbed offered a nice launch angle, which gave me decent height over the net for depth without the racquet feeling too flighty. Both my slice and topspin returns had ample spin to help me keep aggressive shots mostly inside the lines. I found this a good racquet for redirecting pace, and both my down-the-line and cross-court returns were working well."
"I felt like I could control the ball with net clearance and spin when I took a full swing on a forehand or backhand return. "
The Speed Tour allowed Troy to block serves back or swing freely with good spin and net clearance, although he thought adding a bit more weight would make redirecting fast serves even easier, especially on his backhand chip. He said, "I found the stability to be good on my returns. I could block the ball back when I was facing serves with a lot of pace, and the racquet didn't seem to flutter too much. If I wanted to be really picky, I would probably beef up the overall weight just a bit to help me redirect the pace even more easily. I often rely on my backhand chip return to block the ball back deep, and although this racquet did a decent job of that, I think a bit more mass would really make it sing!"
The Speed Tour encouraged Mark to swing more aggressively on his returns. He explained, "Returning serve is where the Speed Tour felt the most neutral or control oriented, which encouraged me to rely less on my slice return and take bigger swings over the top of the ball. The stability of the Speed Tour gave me the directional control I need to keep my doubles return on a cross-court path, and I had good results aiming my returns down the line while playing singles."
Breakdown Summary
| Groundstrokes | 8.8 |
| Volleys | 8.5 |
| Serves | 8.4 |
| Returns | 8.3 |
| Power | 8.1 |
| Control | 8.5 |
| Maneuverability | 8.4 |
| Stability | 8.4 |
| Comfort | 8.4 |
| Touch / Feel | 8.3 |
| Topspin | 8.8 |
| Slice | 8.3 |
Final Verdict |
8.5 |
Tech Specs
| Length | 27 in |
| Head Size | 97 sq in |
| Weight | 11.4 oz |
| Balance Point | 12.79 in |
| Construction | 23mm / 23mm / 23mm |
| String Pattern | 16 x 19 |
| Length | 68.58 cm |
| Head Size | 625.81 sq cm |
| Weight | 323 g |
| Balance Point | 32.49 cm |
| Construction | 23mm / 23mm / 23mm |
| String Pattern | 16 x 19 |
Tennis Warehouse University Lab Data
| Score | Grade | |
| Flex Rating | 61 | LOW |
| Swing Weight | 325 | MED |
Playtester Thoughts

Chris
I was very impressed with this addition to the Speed line. I found it a little faster and easier to use compared to the Head Radical Pro 2025, and it feels livelier and offers a higher launch angle than the Speed Pro 2026. I have always liked the Speed line because it offers control and feel similar to a Head Prestige or a Wilson Blade but with easier power. This Speed Tour takes it even further by bringing lots of responsiveness to every shot. Compared to some other racquets, I'd likely demo this one against the Prince ATS Textreme Tour 98, Wilson Blade 98 16x19 and Yonex Percept 97. All offer a solid blend of control and spin and enough mass to handle heavy hitting, with the Speed Tour being the liveliest of the bunch. Thanks to its responsiveness, I think many will find the Speed Tour to be the one to have.
Solid feel, great sound, lots of spin, solid pace and good maneuverability.
Not quite as controlled as the Speed Pro 2026.
| Chris's Breakdown | |
| Groundstrokes | 8.8 |
| Volleys | 8.9 |
| Serves | 8.7 |
| Returns | 8.8 |
| Power | 8.5 |
| Control | 8.8 |
| Maneuverability | 8.6 |
| Stability | 8.5 |
| Comfort | 9 |
| Touch / Feel | 8.8 |
| Topspin | 8.9 |
| Slice | 8.8 |
| Overall | 8.8 |

Troy
This Head Speed Tour is unique, and I like most things about it. I would say it feels like a mix between a Wilson Pro Staff 97 v14 and a Babolat Pure Strike 98 16x19 or Prince ATS Textreme Tour 98. Its command over the ball sets it apart from the Speed MP (having the 97 head size), but you get some of that forgiveness and added energy return from the thicker 23-mm beam width, closer to what you find from the Pure Strike 98 or Prince Tour 98.
I enjoy many of the older Head Speed racquets, but I am always craving a bit more precision. This Head Speed Tour 2026 delivers on that. It provides a nice blend of pop and spin, and there is decent plow through. I feel like the swingweight makes the Speed Tour 2026 maneuverable but still helps with put-away power, giving me that sensation of hitting through the court.
If I am being really picky, it would be fun to try the Speed Tour with a slightly thinner beam or maybe even a slight taper, so thicker in the hoop and thinner in the throat. Also, I think a slightly denser string pattern would be nice, like a 16x20. I think this racquet is good overall, so there's not much to complain about, but I just want a little more connection to the ball.
| Troy's Breakdown | |
| Groundstrokes | 8.8 |
| Volleys | 8.5 |
| Serves | 8.5 |
| Returns | 8 |
| Power | 8.3 |
| Control | 8 |
| Maneuverability | 8.3 |
| Stability | 8.4 |
| Comfort | 7.7 |
| Touch / Feel | 7.5 |
| Topspin | 8.7 |
| Slice | 8.3 |
| Overall | 8.5 |

Mark
I feel the power level of the 2026 Speed Tour falls in between the Babolat Pure Strike 98 16x19 and the Prince ATS Textreme Tour 98. Solinco's Whiteout 305 and the Tecnifibre TF40 305g (16x19) are in the mix as well.
For my game, Head's new Speed Tour performs like a Swiss Army knife. The combination of its weight, balance, stiffness and slippery 97 head size make it a fast-swinging racquet that is predictable and obedient in most circumstances. I also like the spacing of the 16x19 string pattern, which is extremely topspin friendly for a racquet with eight mains in the throat. The Speed Tour is just as compliant when I add lots of backspin to my drop shots or my backhand slice.
Other than maybe an ever-so-slightly denser string pattern and a more daring colorway, I would not change anything about the Speed Tour.
| Mark's Breakdown | |
| Groundstrokes | 8.5 |
| Volleys | 8 |
| Serves | 8 |
| Returns | 7.5 |
| Power | 7.5 |
| Control | 8 |
| Maneuverability | 8 |
| Stability | 8 |
| Comfort | 8 |
| Touch / Feel | 8 |
| Topspin | 8.5 |
| Slice | 8 |
| Overall | 8.1 |

Munish
This Head Speed Tour reminded me of my Head Prestige MP or the Wilson Blade 98 16x19 but with a little bit more juice. I honestly prefer it that way. I think it's a great addition to the Speed line, and I intend to customize the Speed Tour to bring it closer to my ideal spec. I love my usual racquet (Wilson RF 01 Pro), but the thought of having that frame with the Speed Tour's launch and spin potential is pretty cool.
I love the spin potential, especially considering the 97-square-inch head. I also love the feel of the Speed Tour.
Cosmetic. I really don't like the asymmetrical streak of white on an almost all-black racquet.
| Munish's Breakdown | |
| Groundstrokes | 9 |
| Volleys | 8.7 |
| Serves | 8.3 |
| Returns | 8.7 |
| Power | 8 |
| Control | 9.1 |
| Maneuverability | 8.8 |
| Stability | 8.7 |
| Comfort | 8.8 |
| Touch / Feel | 9 |
| Topspin | 8.9 |
| Slice | 8 |
| Overall | 8.7 |