Head Boom MP 2026 Review
As one of the two teardrop-shaped families from Head, the Boom line offers both power and comfort in spades, and the Head Boom MP 2026 continues that trend with some added feel. This Boom MP 2026 gets Head's new Hy-Bor technology, which is designed for maximum feel and responsiveness. Otherwise, the baseline specs remain the same, with a 100-square-inch head size, 16x19 string pattern, 295-gram (10.4-ounce) unstrung weight, 6 points head light average strung balance and a sub-320 swingweight. Our playtesters were impressed by the update to this power silo, and they reveled in its easy comfort and improved overall feel. Although some of our testers struggled with stability on certain shots, like their returns, the overall consensus proved positive. For players looking for a powerful hitting experience accessible to a variety of players, the Boom MP 2026 is more than up to the task.
- Great comfort
- Excellent power
- Good feel overall
- Lack of stability
- Various individual knocks
Final Verdict
Breakdown
Groundstrokes: 8.4
Across the board, groundstrokes with the Boom MP 2026 proved to be one of the standout areas of performance for our team. The main storylines were this racquet's inherent power, easy maneuverability and comfort on practically every shot. This Boom MP worked well for Jason's aggressive baseline game, and he could swing big off either wing with plenty of RPMs to back up his firepower. He explained, "The Boom MP 2026 really allowed me to swing fast and aggressively. I found it to be very user-friendly, so I was able to just pick it up and play with no real adjustment period needed. I liked that I was able to attack with tons of spin on my forehands at over 2,000 RPMs (data from Zenniz). I really liked rallying with this Boom MP from the baseline, but when it came time to try to win points and be more aggressive, I found the top-end power to be a bit lacking."
Tiffani immediately felt comfortable with the Boom MP 2026, and the racquet's quick handling let her swing through her shots with ease. She said, "I've hit with all the previous versions of the Boom MP, and this 2026 version is comparable to the previous ones. I got everything I expected: easy net clearance, depth and access to spin. The Boom MP 2026 swings super fast, which was my favorite aspect about it. There were times when I started my swing too late and was able to accelerate the racquet head quickly to catch up. I was also able to flick the racquet to really send the ball cross court and move my opponents wide. I thought the Boom MP 2026 felt pretty solid and comfortable for weighing just 11 ounces strung."
"There was above-average maneuverability as well, which helped when I was in the middle of a faster-paced exchange."
Oak felt comfortable swinging out on either wing. He said, "The Boom MP 2026 ended up surprising me a great deal. The feel of this racquet family has never quite been my cup of tea. Strangely enough, I found myself having a great time with this Boom MP 2026, fully trusting my ability to swing out on my favorite shots. Hammering backhands with this racquet was so much fun, and I found good spin and feel on my forehand as well. My slices were surprisingly reliable and low, with good sideways action. The Boom MP 2026 definitely skews toward power, so picking bigger targets proved key. It was fun to swing out freely and really slap the ball once I had a target in mind. Perhaps the biggest surprise to me was the racquet's stability when met with heavier pace. The hoop feels flexible without being mushy, and I felt mostly connected to the ball. This Boom MP 2026 was a good fit for my game style, although I struggled to finish points at times when in match play."
Kyla felt that she could trust her aggressive baseline game with the Boom MP 2026 in her hands, despite noticing a slight lack of stability. She described, "I really enjoyed this Boom MP 2026 from the baseline. It felt light, quick and extremely maneuverable, making it easy to get it into position and generate racquet head speed. I was able to produce easy depth and topspin without having to overcompensate on the swing, and it felt very comfortable on my arm overall. That said, the lighter weight did cause issues at times, especially against heavier, faster balls. The Boom MP didn't feel particularly stable in those situations and could get pushed around, which made it harder to maintain control when defending or trading pace. For my game style, it offered great speed and spin but at the cost of some stability."
Volleys: 7.9
Our team enjoyed the Boom MP 2026's improved feel and its connection to the ball at the net, which let them volley with confidence. The Boom MP felt smooth and quick to Kyla, but she noted a lack of stability that made it harder for her to trust it at times. She said, "At the net, the Boom MP 2026 felt similar to how it played at the baseline: quick and easy to maneuver. It was especially effective for punching volleys and reacting quickly. The feel was comfortable and responsive, but the lack of mass was noticeable when balls were hit hard at me, and the racquet didn't feel as solid as I'd like. On softer touch volleys, the lightness made it easier to miss short into the net."
While he enjoyed the overall feel of the Boom MP 2026 at net, Oak had some trouble finding the depth he wanted on his volleys, so he went for shorter angles to compensate. He explained, "I thought volleys had great feel and spin with this Boom MP 2026, but I was struggling a little bit with depth. It felt like I had to be very intentional about sticking the ball deep as opposed to just putting the racquet out and letting it do the work. The feel was flexible at net, but it was never mushy. As such, I opted for shorter volleys and sharper angles to take time away from my opponents."
"I definitely feel more connected to my volleys and can judge my drop volleys better with this version."
Jason was impressed with the Boom MP 2026’s feel at net, but the lack of torsional stability made it harder to trust. He said, "The improvement with this 2026 Boom MP over the previous version is in the feel. The downside up at net is the lack of torsional stability. The Boom MP 2026 tends to get pushed around a bit, especially on off-center shots."
Tiffani also had some issues with depth on her volleys, but she was able to utilize the Boom MP's quick handling to either prepare early or catch up to shots when late. She described, "Once again, the Boom MP 2026's standout feature here was its maneuverability. I could really get the racquet to the ball quickly. At net, however, is where I felt the racquet could use a bit more stability. I could punch the ball deep when I caught the ball cleanly and kept a firm hand, but there was some wobble when I caught the ball off center. I struggle with touch at the net, and with this Boom MP I tended to drop the ball too short and into the net when trying to use softer hands."
Serves: 8.4
Serving with the Boom MP 2026 was characterized by the racquet's easy handling and power, but our team found ample spin as well. Tiffani found above-average handling and spin production with the Boom MP 2026 when serving. She explained, "I liked how this Boom MP 2026 swung overhead on my serves, and I could keep my swing speeds up over long games. There was good access to spin, and I saw decent pace numbers when practicing my serves with our Zenniz smart court. I don't think I was hitting a really heavy ball, though, because those higher MPHs weren't translating into any more free points during match play."
Jason enjoyed the automatic nature of this racquet on serve. He said, "The Boom MP 2026 is really easy to serve with. It accelerates quickly up and through contact. I was serving at a high percentage due to the ease of use and the access to spin, but I wanted a bit more pop on my first serves."
"Placement was solid, and the Boom MP 2026 was easy to accelerate through the service motion."
Kyla seemed to have a more favorable experience when serving, highlighted by the pace she could generate on first serves. She said, "This Boom MP 2026 felt great on serve, particularly my first serves. I felt confident swinging fast and going after the ball. It allowed me to generate good pace, especially on body serves, which was my favorite serve to hit with this racquet. I struggled slightly on second serves. My topspin serves tended to pop up a bit more than I'd like, but that can be fixed by coming over the ball faster."
Although Oak thought the Boom MP 2026 lacked some plow through on his serve, he found good spin and handling. He said, "Serves are an area where I was left wanting just a little bit more from the updated Boom MP. While I was getting good spin on my serves, I felt like the racquet lacked a little punch, which was surprising considering how much of a hammer it was on groundstrokes. So the Boom MP 2026 was a tad disappointing for me on serves, but that could likely be fixed with some customizing. My best serves with this racquet were slice serves out wide to the deuce court and slices up the T on the ad court.”
Returns: 7.8
Returns with the Boom MP 2026 proved to be a bit of a mixed bag for our team, with some testers able to go after the shot they wanted and others noting a lack of confidence when returning. Oak had a tougher time trusting his return game because he felt limited by the targets available to him. He described, "Returns were hard for me to trust with this racquet. I like to go after smaller targets when I’m returning, and the Boom MP 2026 wasn't always the best racquet for that strategy. I often struggled to create good depth, and I found myself behind in the point far earlier than I'd like. As such, I really had to try to up the aggression with this racquet, which would in turn cause me to spray the ball wide or long occasionally. Thankfully, there was good maneuverability, so I never felt pressed for time on return."
Kyla felt a little let down by the lighter nature of the Boom MP 2026, and she had some issues with stability against heavier serves. She noted, "Serve returns were one of the tougher areas for me with this racquet. The lighter weight worked against me when I was facing bigger first serves or heavy pace, and I struggled to keep the racquet stable through contact. That said, the Boom MP 2026 did perform well when there wasn't time for a full swing and I just needed to block returns back into play. It was quick enough to get around my body, but I would have preferred more mass and stability through contact."
The Boom MP's speedy nature made for great results on Tiffani's returns. She explained, "This Boom MP 2026 comes around so fast! I really appreciated the maneuverability of this racquet, and I didn't feel late on my returns. The Boom MP felt plenty stable when I got good contact on my return, but when I had to lunge for the ball this racquet wasn't quite heavy enough for me to just take a stab at the return. Still, it was a mostly positive experience, and I could start return games with confidence."
On the positive side, Jason felt free to swing out and go after his returns consistently with the Boom MP 2026. He said, "I had fun hitting returns with this Boom MP 2026. It's super fast through the air and has so much spin that I could 'grip it and rip it' on my returns. I felt like I could take a good cut at the ball even on body serves or out-wide serves. The Boom MP 2026 did struggle a bit with stability against bigger servers, though."
Breakdown Summary
| Groundstrokes | 8.4 |
| Volleys | 7.9 |
| Serves | 8.4 |
| Returns | 7.8 |
| Power | 8.3 |
| Control | 8.1 |
| Maneuverability | 9.1 |
| Stability | 7.8 |
| Comfort | 8.9 |
| Touch / Feel | 8.4 |
| Topspin | 8.6 |
| Slice | 8.2 |
Final Verdict |
8.3 |
Tech Specs
| Length | 27 in |
| Head Size | 100 sq in |
| Weight | 11 oz |
| Balance Point | 12.79 in |
| Construction | 23mm / 24mm / 22mm |
| String Pattern | 16 x 19 |
| Length | 68.58 cm |
| Head Size | 645.16 sq cm |
| Weight | 312 g |
| Balance Point | 32.49 cm |
| Construction | 23mm / 24mm / 22mm |
| String Pattern | 16 x 19 |
Tennis Warehouse University Lab Data
| Score | Grade | |
| Flex Rating | 61 | LOW |
| Swing Weight | 316 | LOW |
Playtester Thoughts

Jason
The playability of this Head Boom MP 2026 is nearly identical to the previous version, but the addition of Hy-bor really made a positive difference in the feel.
Better, more responsive feel than previous version. Very user-friendly, with fantastic whippability.
The Boom MP 2026 feels slightly under powered compared to racquets of similar specs, and it can get pushed around (especially at net).
| Jason's Breakdown | |
| Groundstrokes | 8.5 |
| Volleys | 7.9 |
| Serves | 8.8 |
| Returns | 8.3 |
| Power | 8.3 |
| Control | 8.3 |
| Maneuverability | 9.6 |
| Stability | 8.1 |
| Comfort | 9 |
| Touch / Feel | 8.7 |
| Topspin | 9.2 |
| Slice | 8.4 |
| Overall | 8.5 |

Tiffani
The differences between each generation of the Boom MP come down to feel. This Boom MP 2026 is one of the most comfortable options I can think of with a 295-gram unstrung weight. The Head Gravity MP is also quite comfortable at the same weight, but this Boom MP 2026 offers easier depth and pace. I think this racquet falls between the Yonex VCORE 100 and VCORE 100L.
I like the cosmetic options (the purple is my favorite!). This Boom MP 2026 is a comfortable racquet that offers easy depth and spin.
The Boom MP 2026 feels slightly under powered compared to racquets of similar specs, and it can get pushed around (especially at net).
| Tiffani's Breakdown | |
| Groundstrokes | 8 |
| Volleys | 8 |
| Serves | 8.5 |
| Returns | 8 |
| Power | 8.5 |
| Control | 8 |
| Maneuverability | 9 |
| Stability | 7.8 |
| Comfort | 8.8 |
| Touch / Feel | 8.1 |
| Topspin | 8.8 |
| Slice | 7.9 |
| Overall | 8.1 |

Oak
I'd say that this Head Boom MP 2026 is an overall improvement compared to its predecessors, with the biggest upsides being the frame's stability and power. This racquet reminds me of the Head Extreme MP, the Yonex EZONE 100 and the Gravity MP. All of those frames tend to specialize a little more in certain areas (spin, feel and control, respectively), whereas the Boom MP 2026 feels more like an all-around type frame. Compared to the Prince ATS Textreme Tour 98 or Tecnifibre TFight 305S, this Boom MP 2026 has more power and dwell time, but a lot less feel and control.
I really like the power of this racquet and the stability off either wing, both when injecting and absorbing pace. Decent spin as well.
I struggle the most with this racquet on serves and returns, arguably the two most important shots in one's game. I want more clarity and consistency in these areas.
| Oak's Breakdown | |
| Groundstrokes | 8.6 |
| Volleys | 7.8 |
| Serves | 7.6 |
| Returns | 7.5 |
| Power | 8.5 |
| Control | 8.1 |
| Maneuverability | 8.4 |
| Stability | 8.4 |
| Comfort | 8.5 |
| Touch / Feel | 8.3 |
| Topspin | 8.4 |
| Slice | 8.6 |
| Overall | 8.2 |

Kyla
This playtest was my first experience with a Boom racquet. I liked the Boom MP 2026 about the same as the Yonex VCORE 98 8th Gen racquet. Both racquets were fun to play with, but they both had drawbacks, just in different realms. With some added weight for stability, I think this Boom MP 2026 could become a very solid option. That said, I still prefer my racquet of choice. With my frame I don't feel like I have to sacrifice stability to get similar maneuverability.
I like how quick and easy to maneuver the Boom MP 2026 is. I also like how comfortable and easy on the arm it feels. It performs well when I’m generating my own pace and provides easy access to speed and spin.
I don't like how the Boom MP 2026 lacks stability against heavy pace.
| Kyla's Breakdown | |
| Groundstrokes | 8.5 |
| Volleys | 7.9 |
| Serves | 8.7 |
| Returns | 7.2 |
| Power | 7.8 |
| Control | 7.8 |
| Maneuverability | 9.2 |
| Stability | 6.8 |
| Comfort | 9.1 |
| Touch / Feel | 8.6 |
| Topspin | 7.9 |
| Slice | 7.7 |
| Overall | 8.2 |