Wilson Burn FST 95 Racquet Review

Summary
With the game of tennis getting faster every day, Wilson has reinvented the midsize racquet (yes, now 95s are considered mids!) with the Burn FST 95. This modern, control-oriented racquet has been constructed to help big hitters dictate play from all areas of the court. The octagonal beam design and Fast Speed Technology (FST) provide an aerodynamic and whippy response, but big hitters will find enough mass to drive the ball through the court. Wilson has used high performance carbon fiber to help this racquet feel solid, yet plush, on contact. As a result, the Burn FST 95 offers a surprisingly soft response for a racquet with an RA rating of 71. Loaded with control, the Burn FST 95 helped our testers strike shots with precision, spin and ample power. Our playtesters felt the stability and soft feel were the main strengths of this racquet at the net. They had fun hitting touch shots and aggressive volleys. When serving, most of our team appreciated the Burn FST 95's accuracy, but they craved just a little more power for their first serves. The playtesters who like to hit aggressive returns were rewarded when they took big cuts at the ball or pulled their opponents off the court. All in all, we found this racquet to have a great blend of control, spin and feel. Players with fast, full swings who are looking to add some control and precision to their aggressive game will want to take the Burn FST 95 for a spin.
Wilson Burn FST 95 Racquet Scores
Power | 80 |
Control | 87 |
Maneuverability | 82 |
Stability | 85 |
Comfort | 84 |
Touch/Feel | 84 |
Serves | 83 |
Groundstrokes | 84 |
Returns | 86 |
Slice | 85 |
Topspin | 86 |
Volleys | 86 |
Overall | 85 |
Groundstrokes - Score: 84
With a hefty swingweight of 331, the Burn FST 95 has enough mass to trade heavy balls or effectively redirect pace. Chris expected the Burn FST 95 to feel stiffer and more powerful than it did, and he was surprised by the response. He explained, "The response was soft, somewhat muted and very controlled. I had great directional and depth control on my shots. I liked how I could take a big cut at the ball without fear of hitting long. I was also able to turn that racquet head speed into spin. The thin beam seemed to promote going for maximum spin; it didn't look like it would get in the way on an aggressive angle of attack, although I still managed to shank a few shots to remind myself of my amateur status! When I did find the strings I was getting a solid level of spin. Both my topspin and slice shots had nice action on them. The spin further enhanced the control, making this a consistent racquet for me to hit."
Singing a similar tune, Michelle offered, "The first time I hit with this racquet I was at a demo day with Wilson, which meant I tried a few different racquets. The Burn FST 95 wasn't my favorite that day, so I wasn't sure what I would think going into this playtest. I typically don't gravitate toward racquets with a softer, muted, lower powered response, but when I started playing groundstroke games with this racquet the results were great. I couldn't miss. I instantly had built in control behind my shots. The accuracy and control were awesome, and they made me want to keep the racquet in my hands longer than I expected. Depth and spin came naturally, and my defensive balls were deep enough to keep my opponents from taking advantage of them. I could also be scrappy and get a lot of balls back, and then when I was ready to step up and put the ball away, I could. I was getting good depth and I wasn't making as many errors. It didn't feel like I had enough power to put balls away, but I was winning points by working the point a bit longer and wearing my opponent down. I was able to accelerate the Burn FST 95 quickly and attack the ball full on, and then I let the control come into play when needed. If I had to pick one thing I didn't love about this racquet on groundies, it was that I didn't feel like my shots hurt my opponents as much as when I'm hitting with my Wilson Pro Staff RF97 Autograph. My shots didn't feel as heavy or penetrating, but the Burn FST 95 seemed to do the trick!"
"From the first time I picked up this Wilson Burn FST 95, I felt right at home with the weight and balance," began Troy, whose current racquet is the discontinued Wilson Six.One 95. "This racquet felt fast and easy to swing when I was hitting groundstrokes, and at the same time it had plenty of mass to hit penetrating shots. I found spin easy to access with the 16x19 string pattern, and I was able to create sharp angles when hitting cross court. I was able to hit penetrating slice backhands as well. The feel of this racquet on contact was very plush and dampened, and it didn't play as stiff as the 71 stiffness rating indicates. My only knock on this racquet was that it the response felt very muted, which was good for dampening the harsh vibrations, but at the same time I sometimes felt disconnected from my shot placement. Overall, control was good, but I would need more time with this racquet to feel completely dialed in."
Control and spin were by far the two standout features of the Burn FST 95 for Karly. She said, "I was controlling points more with placement than I was with power, and my PlaySight data showed my average spin was up a couple hundred RPMs on my groundstrokes. I could hit the targets I was aiming for while adding lots of spin for a more aggressive shot. However, even though the racquet offered noticeably more control than power, I was also surprised with how much pop I got from the sweetspot. I thought the Burn FST 95 was one of the liveliest 95 square-inch frames I've used, although that lively response was also inconsistent depending on where I made contact. When I hit the sweetspot the ball left the stringbed with good pop, but when I hit outside the sweetspot the response felt very dead. The high swingweight also made the racquet feel sluggish, so I focused more on getting the racquet around in time and making good contact from the baseline."

Volleys - Score: 86
Our playtesters agreed that the Burn FST 95 had plenty of feel and stability at net. Michelle had no complaints when it came to volleying with this racquet, saying, "I really enjoyed this racquet at net. The smaller head size was great for precision, and the racquet was easy to wield against hard hitters. I could also create fun angles and touch shots with the softer response. The racquets I'm playtesting usually don't feel stable enough to me because I play with a very stable racquet. This racquet had enough stability and maneuverability for me."
"When I came to net I liked the plush and stable response of the Burn FST 95," began Troy. "There was plenty of stability when I was volleying hard shots hit directly at me, and the plush feel of this racquet allowed me to hit soft drop-volleys with ease. I found it easy to maneuver when at net, which allowed me to react quickly during fast exchanges. This Wilson Burn FST 95 allowed me to have good command over my volleys, and I felt confident hitting close to the lines. While playing doubles I loved the blend of stability, maneuverability, and touch this racquet provided for me at net."
The stability of the Burn FST 95 was Karly's favorite feature when volleying with it. She said, "The RA rating was pretty high, and it had a stiffer feel than most racquets, but it wasn't uncomfortably stiff. It felt firm and solid, it didn't flutter in my hands when I made contact with the ball, and power came easy at the net without losing any control. I enjoyed its combination of power and precision because it allowed me to put the ball away more quickly than I could from the baseline."
"The same controlled feel I found from the baseline dominated my experiences at net with this racquet," stated Chris. "I had good feel on my touch and placement volleys, and there was enough power to help me punch volleys away. I also liked the fact that the Burn FST 95 was fast and easy to maneuver. Impressively, it felt pretty darn solid, too. To say I enjoyed this racquet at net would be an understatement, and I was looking to get in at every opportunity."
Serves - Score: 83
Although playtesters were a bit split on the power level when serving with the Burn FST 95, everyone agreed that the racquet offered good spin and precision. The maneuverability and the spin potential of the Wilson Burn FST 95 had Troy feeling confident while serving. He said, "This Burn FST 95 is about a half ounce lighter than my Wilson Six.One 95, and I felt that this boosted my racquet head speed. With the maneuverable feel, I was getting good pop on my flat first serves. This racquet was giving me good precision and spin, which allowed me to hit some heavy kick serves to the corners of the service boxes. The control allowed me to consistently locate my targets in the service box. I would have to rank this Wilson Burn FST 95 right up there with the Head Graphene XT Prestige Pro as one of my favorite racquets to serve with."
Although this racquet offered much more control than power on groundstrokes for her, Karly recorded her fastest serve on PlaySight with the Burn FST 95. "Power came naturally with serves. On contact the ball jumped off the racquet with tons of pop and pace. However, all the easy power also meant I had less control. I wasn't making my first serves consistently and had to hit more second serves than usual. Luckily, the racquet still offered great spin potential, which made it easier to serve the ball in with an aggressive kick."
Great control and great spin, but a tad underpowered summed up Chris' serving experiences. He said, "I think I could get back some power by adding weight to the tip and stringing it lower and/or using a more powerful string. I served well and felt like I could take command of the point when first serves found their targets. I just wasn't getting as many free points as I do with my Babolat Pure Drive Plus."
"I didn't completely gel with this racquet on serve," commented Michelle. "Karly mentioned that she was getting ample power on her first serves and Troy was getting great spin, but I just didn't find either. I felt like I was trying so hard to get some power behind my first serves and good movement on my second serves, and the result was at best mediocre. Although I did appreciate the precision, I just felt that my serves weren't effective with this racquet. I had to change my strategy and pick my spots rather than trying to overpower my opponent."

Returns - Score: 86
Our team could take big cuts on their returns and start points off offensively with the Burn FST 95. The blend of control, power and precision made this a great racquet for Chris to return with. He said, "Its fast feel and the high level of control had me swinging with confidence. I liked how I could take a good rip at the ball and not worry about overhitting. Again, spin was easy to generate. The racquet also felt plenty comfortable even when my contact with the ball wasn't 100 percent clean."
Michelle said, "I tend to take big swings at my returns, and this racquet rewarded me because I could get it moving quickly and attack, but it also helped add control when I was going too big. I really felt like I had a plethora of return options. I could be aggressive or dip balls back cross court to put myself in an offensive position at the start of the point. There was a comfortable, stable response, and even when I hit outside the sweetspot I wasn't in trouble with my return."
The stability and plush feel are what stood out for Troy with this Wilson Burn FST 95 when he was hitting returns. He said, "The stability of this racquet was evident against big servers, and it allowed me to plow through the ball with ease. This racquet provided enough mass to help me get good depth on my returns. The Wilson Burn FST 95 carved through the ball when I was hitting backhand slice returns, and I could effectively get the ball deep at the opponent's feet. Because the Wilson Burn FST 95 felt plush, I found a favorable sensation on contact even when I didn't time my returns perfectly. I enjoyed returning serves with this racquet and felt that it performed similar to my Wilson Six.One 95."
Karly, however, struggled with her returns because of the sluggish feel and high swingweight of the Burn FST 95. She explained, "I had to focus on getting into position faster, which was tough when hitting against harder servers. I also had to make sure I made contact in the sweetspot, otherwise my shots felt dead. However, when I was able to set up in time and make good contact, I could use its precision to take the offensive."
Overall - Score: 85
Technical Specifications | ||
---|---|---|
Length | 27 in | 69 cm |
Head Size | 95 sq in | 613 sq cm |
Weight | 11.9 oz | 337 gm |
Balance Point | 12.85 in 33 cm | 5pts Head Light |
Construction | 19.5mm / 21mm / 21mm | |
Composition | Carbon Fiber | |
String Pattern | 16 Mains / 19 Crosses |
Babolat RDC Ratings | ||
---|---|---|
Score | Grade | |
Flex Rating | 71 | Range: 0-100 |
Swing Weight | 331 | Range: 200-400 |
Chris' Scores | |||
---|---|---|---|
Power | 7.8 | Serves | 8 |
Control | 8.5 | Groundstrokes | 8.2 |
Maneuverability | 8.2 | Returns | 8.5 |
Stability | 7.9 | Slice | 8.3 |
Comfort | 8.4 | Topspin | 8.6 |
Touch/Feel | 8.5 | Volleys | 8.5 |
Overall | 8.1 |
Michelle's Scores | |||
---|---|---|---|
Power | 7.8 | Serves | 7.8 |
Control | 9 | Groundstrokes | 8.7 |
Maneuverability | 8.5 | Returns | 9 |
Stability | 8.5 | Slice | 8.4 |
Comfort | 8.5 | Topspin | 8.5 |
Touch/Feel | 8.8 | Volleys | 8.5 |
Overall | 8.7 |
Troy's Scores | |||
---|---|---|---|
Power | 8.3 | Serves | 9.2 |
Control | 8.8 | Groundstrokes | 8.5 |
Maneuverability | 8.8 | Returns | 8.8 |
Stability | 9 | Slice | 8.8 |
Comfort | 8.5 | Topspin | 8.6 |
Touch/Feel | 8.5 | Volleys | 8.8 |
Overall | 8.7 |
Karly's Scores | |||
---|---|---|---|
Power | 7.9 | Serves | 8.3 |
Control | 8.3 | Groundstrokes | 8 |
Maneuverability | 7.3 | Returns | 7.9 |
Stability | 8.4 | Slice | 8.4 |
Comfort | 8.2 | Topspin | 8.5 |
Touch/Feel | 7.8 | Volleys | 8.4 |
Overall | 8.3 |
Playtester Profiles
Chris: 4.5 all-court player currently using the Babolat Pure Drive Plus. Chris uses a semi-western forehand grip, has a fast swing style and hits a one-handed backhand.
Michelle: Open level baseline player with a semi-western forehand and a two handed backhand. She currently plays with the Wilson Pro Staff RF 97 Autograph.
Troy: 5.0 lefty all-court player with a full Western Forehand and a two-handed backhand. Troy currently plays with a Wilson BLX Six.One 95.
Karly: 4.0 baseline player currently playing with the Prince Textreme Tour 95. She hits with a semi-western forehand grip and uses a two handed backhand.
Likes
Chris - "I liked the spin, control, comfort and fast, yet solid, feel."
Michelle - "The Burn FST 95 was a racquet I didn't plan to like, but I enjoyed it based on how I played with it in my hands. I honestly felt like I had an almost perfect blend of control and power in a fast racquet. I feel like it's the kind of racquet a coach would persuade me to start using because it is a smarter option for a player like me, instead of using a guilty pleasure racquet that is fun to blast balls with."
Troy - "This racquet felt solid and plush, and it had good plow through. I liked the longer than average handle length for my two-handed backhand."
Karly - "Surprisingly, I liked the spin potential the most. Normally, I'd like the control of a midsize frame, but I was really impressed with how spin friendly the Burn FST 95 was."
Dislikes
Chris - "I'd like it in a slightly longer length for a tad more power (but the Wilson Burn 95 Nishikori racquet meets that need, and it's due out in April)."
Michelle - "I don't really have too many dislikes. I just didn't love this racquet when serving. I felt like I had to work too hard to be effective. Other than that, I could have used a tad more power, but I think that would defeat the purpose of this racquet ... and spoiler alert, there might be something like that coming from Wilson later in the year!"
Troy - "It took some time for me to get used to the muted response of this racquet when I was swinging big on my groundstrokes."
Karly - "I didn't like the sluggish feel and inconsistent response when hitting outside the sweetspot."
Comparing the racquet to others they've tried, our testers said:
Chris - "It's tough for me to compare the Burn FST 95 to other racquets because it has a fairly unique feel. I'd say it plays with a firmer response than the Prince Textreme Tour 95, and it offers a bit more power, but it's not quite as sweet in feel. The Babolat Pure Strike Tour swings with similar mass and also offers dynamite control."
Michelle - "I haven't hit much with the older Burn racquets, but the new Burn racquets feel completely different, so don't expect the feel of the former Burn line here. Spec wise, other than the head size, the Burn FST 95 is similar to the Pure Aero Tour, but I had much more control with the Burn FST 95 and less raw power. Also, the sweetspot is a bit smaller in the Burn FST 95, which can be expected from a smaller head sized racquet. I would also say it's comparable to the Head Prestige Pro -- thinner beam and control-oriented, with a quick response to add some power when needed."
Troy - "I have been using the Wilson Six.One 95 (18x20) for a few years, and this Wilson Burn FST 95 has some similar traits. I don't think that the Burn FST 95 has quite the precision and response of my Wilson Six.One 95 (18x20), but it still performs well. The Burn FST 95 feels like a cross between the Six.One 95 and the Wilson Blade 98. Another racquet that comes to mind is the Babolat Pure Strike Tour, but the Burn FST 95 has easier access to spin and feels a bit more maneuverable."
Karly - "I thought the Burn FST 95 offered more power than the Prince Textreme Tour 95, which is my racquet of choice. I could hit a much more powerful shot with the Burn FST 95, especially when I made good contact on the stringbed. However, I thought it was easier to play more consistently with the Textreme Tour 95 than with the Burn FST 95."