Racquet Playtest Comparison: O3 White vs nPro Open vs TFlash 290

About the play testerAbout the racquets

Name: Kreative

Playing Level 4.0

Regular racquet, string & tension Babolat Pure Drive Std., Luxilon ALU Power, 56 lbs.

Tell us about your game An aggressive counter-puncher developing a more all-court game. Moderate to fast swing speeds, short backswing. Full western forehand grip, 2-handed backhand, 1-handed backhand slice, serves and volleys range between continental and eastern backhand. Playing 50% singles, 50% doubles.

Power

Prince O3 White: Definitely the most powerful of the 3 racquets tested. Balls would sail past the baseline if I didn't consciously add spin. The ball just seems to dwell then launch off the stringbed. The O3 White really added some juice on my flat serves, and even spin serves had plenty of pace. Volleys had good stick, and were easy to keep deep. Sliced backhands were biting and penetrating. I liked hitting returns with the White. It was easy to block back hard hit serves with good depth, but I had to be more cautious about being aggressive on second serves else the balls would fly. I felt the White was more powerful than my current Pure Drive.

Prince O3 White Racquet
Maria Sharapova's racquet, this one offers power, control, comfort and maneuverability. Well suited to an all court game. Features a 27" frame length, 100sq. in. headsize and a 16/19 string pattern.
Wilson nPro Open nCode Racquets
Spin friendly racquet ideal for aggressive topspin players. Offers a clean and crisp feel and excellent maneuverability. Midplus 100sq. in. headsize, standard length, 16/19 string pattern.
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 Racquets
Blends some useful power, good access to spin and a stable response at impact to create a racquet with broad appeal. Headsize: 100sq. in. Length: Standard (27”). String pattern: 16/19. Weight: 11 ounces (strung).

Wilson nPro Open: The nPro Open was the least powerful racquet in this playtest. There was a crisp response off the stringbed, but balls were landing short. I felt that it lacked some mass in the upper hoop to help hit through the ball. Power on serves was average, and I felt myself going more for placement than pace. It was a little tough to keep the volleys and returns deep. The Open felt less powerful than previous generations of the Surge. I would try stringing with a soft multifilament for a bump in power.

Tecnifibre TFlash 290: The TFlash 290 has moderate power and I adjusted to the racquet easily. I could consistently keep the ball deep from the baseline and had moderate pace on serves. Volleys were kind of a mixed bag. If I just blocked volleys, they tended to land a little short, but if I tried punching them, they tended to fly out. Returns were average with the 290,but I had to stay more on the aggressive side to get good results.

Control

Prince O3 White: The O3 White ranked last in control compared to the other 2. As mentioned earlier, I had to consciously hit with spin to keep the ball in the court. I didn't feel as confident hitting the corners. Short angles (groundstrokes and volleys) were also difficult to hit. Most of them sailed past the lines, or when they landed in, seemed to just sit up. On serves, I felt almost Roddick-esque with lots of pace, but I could not find much placement. Again, I felt more comfortable aiming deep in the box instead of for the corners.

Wilson nPro Open: Control with the nPro Open was average, although trying to keep the ball consistently deep was difficult. It had a smallish sweetspot, and balls hit outside of this zone were lackadaisical. Felt good control working the short angles, especially on the volleys. Slices had good response; I could float them deep, or hit a nice, tight short angle. Had decent placement with spin and kick serves.

Tecnifibre TFlash 290: The TFlash 290 had the best control out of the 3 racquets in this playtest. Performance-wise, it felt close to my Pure Drive, so I didn't need much time to adjust my strokes. The big difference came on volleys, where the response wasn't as consistent. Otherwise, on groundstrokes, I felt confident going for the corners or for the topspin angles. On serves, I was comfortable swinging slices or kickers out wide and hitting flat ones up the T with good placement.

Maneuverability

Prince O3 White: Maneuverability is slightly more maneuverable than the TFlash 290. Even though the O3 White was heavier statically, that weight is towards the handle, making it a bit more headlight. It seems to cut through the air easily, which may be because of the O Ports, or its aerodynamic design. This gives it a slightly whippier feel than the TFlash 290. Most noticeable on groundstrokes, but had no problems with serves, volleys or overheads.

Wilson nPro Open: Definitely the most maneuverable out of the three I playtested. Its light weight and balance made it easy to react to quick volley exchanges. I was also able to whip more on the ball and get more spin on groundstrokes. Not at all sluggish on serves and I could generate good kick on my serves.

Tecnifibre TFlash 290: While I ranked it the lowest in maneuverability, the TFlash 290 was still very maneuverable. The balance feels a little closer to even balance, but it doesn't feel cumbersome. Again, it was very close to my current racquet, the Pure Drive, and I adjusted easily on all shots.

Stability

Prince O3 White: The O3 White felt the most stable out of the 3 racquets tested. The sweetspot felt large, expanding nearly the whole racquet face. Its muted feel gave the sensation of being stable good shot response on off center hits without any jarring feel. I also didn't feel the racquet twisting in my hand, only when I didn't grip tight enough because the bevels are so round..

Wilson nPro Open: The nPro Open was the least stable racquet in this playtest. Its lack of weight in the head just gave it a smallish sweetspot. When hit outside of this zone, I could feel the racquet twisting which produced a weak response. The upper hoop felt dead and shots hit in this zone were jarring. Adding some lead in the hoop could add some stability to the nPro Open as well as enlarge the sweetspot.

Tecnifibre TFlash 290: The TFlash 290 felt stable on shots hit in the sweetspot. Off center hits had a similar jarring feel I've found from other Tecnifibre racquets. I did feel some racquet twisting on balls hit outside the sweetspot.

Comfort

Prince O3 White: I found the White to be the most comfortable racquet in this playtest. It feels very muted, sometimes to the point I couldn't feel the ball at all on contact. Still, it was comfortable and soft feeling. I didn't feel any jarring or racquet twisting on off center hits.

Wilson nPro Open: The nPro Open ranked least in comfort. The stringbed felt harsh and stiff, which was extremely noticeable on off center shots. Hitting for an extended period of time, I experienced some discomfort from the firm feel of this racquet.

Tecnifibre TFlash 290: The TFlash 290 felt comfortable on shots hit in the sweetspot, but I couldn't detract from the tinny feel. It felt very metallic with a pinging response - especially on off center hits. Despite getting some good results, I just couldn't get used to its feel.

Spin

Prince O3 White: Generating spin with the O3 White was more difficult than I expected. The frame had a lot of pop so I had to consciously add spin in order to keep the ball in the court. This caused the ball to sit up a little more than I would like. Slices on the other hand were biting and penetrating without much bounce.

Wilson nPro Open: I was able to get the most spin out of the nPro Open. Its light weight coupled with its low swingweight allowed me to generate lots of racquet head speed which led to spin. I was also able to generate lots of kick on my serves.

Tecnifibre TFlash 290: Spin with the 290 was moderate. I could generate good topspin while driving the ball, which kept the ball deep with good margin of error. My slices tended to float a bit more than usual. Short angles were slightly easier to hit with the 290 than my Pure Drive with topspin that swung the opponent wide.

Comfort
Prince O3 White 85
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 77
Wilson nPro Open 70
Control
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 85
Wilson nPro Open 80
Prince O3 White 75
Groundstrokes
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 85
Prince O3 White 80
Wilson nPro Open 75
Maneuverability
Wilson nPro Open 85
Prince O3 White 80
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 78
Power
Prince O3 White 85
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 80
Wilson nPro Open 75
Serve Returns
Prince O3 White 80
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 75
Wilson nPro Open 70
Serves and Overheads
Prince O3 White 85
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 80
Wilson nPro Open 75
Slice
Prince O3 White 80
Wilson nPro Open 75
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 70
Stability
Prince O3 White 80
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 75
Wilson nPro Open 70
Topspin
Wilson nPro Open 80
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 77
Prince O3 White 72
Touch/Feel
Wilson nPro Open 72
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 68
Prince O3 White 63
Volleys
Prince O3 White 70
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 67
Wilson nPro Open 65
Overall
Prince O3 White 85
Tecnifibre TFlash 290 80
Wilson nPro Open 75


Playtest date: May, 2006.
All content copyright 2007 Tennis Warehouse.

return
to home
Toll Free in the U.S. 1-800-8-TENNIS  |  U.S. Customer Email info@tennis-warehouse.com
International Email twint@tennis-warehouse.com