String Playtest Comparison: ALU Power Rough vs Kirschbaum Competition
| About the play tester | About the String |
|
Tester: Kevo on the Talk Tennis message board
Playing Level: 4.0
Regular playing equipment: Babolat Pure Storm Team 98 with Cyberflash 17g at 58 lbs
Game Style: Mostly baseline when playing singles, but I play doubles about half the time.
Strings being tested: Luxilon ALU Rough, Kirschbaum Competition
Gauge: ALU Rough: 17, Competition: 16L
Racquet(s) string is in: Babolat Pure Storm Team 98
Tension: 55 lbs
|
|
A textured version of ALU Power designed to grip the ball for increased spin. Not quite as durable as ALU Power, but still a very durable string.
| |
|
Stringing
ALU Rough was strung one piece and has what I would consider normal stretch for a poly. About half the stretch of a basic Syn Gut. It is stiff but not that difficult to weave except on the last couple of crosses. It does have a lot of coil memory, so it can kink if you don't manage the slack string well. Kirschbaum Competition also strung up like a typical poly. A little less coil memory than the ALU, but you still have to manage the slack to avoid kinking.
Power
ALU Rough is not really a power string. It definitely has less power than the typical multi at a similar tension. It does, however, work well for hitting with power because of the added control. Kirschbaum Competition has slightly less power than the ALU. It is definitely a control string that works well for hard hitters.
Control
ALU Rough has plenty of control. Like most poly's, the stiffness of the string really seems to reduce power and add to spin. This string seems to perform best when taking big cuts at the ball and hitting with spin. Control doesn't seem nearly as precise when hitting soft shots or hitting flat. Kirschbaum Competition has marvelous control. It works especially well when hitting hard like the ALU Rough, but it doesn't have quite the same loss of control when hitting flat or slow moving shots. There are no surprises from the stringbed. It's a very consistent string unlike some of the other poly's I've tried. You always seem to get out of this string what you put into it.
Comfort
ALU Rough is fairly comfortable for a poly. I didn't have any discomfort after some heavy hitting and I found that even on mis-hits it didn't seem any worse than a Syn Gut. I did string this about 5 lbs. looser than I would a Syn Gut though, and that may account for some additional comfort. Kirschbaum Competition is one of the most comfortable polys I've hit with. It has a very nice feel and very little excess vibration. It seems to pocket the ball a little bit more than a typical poly and that seems to soften up the shock of the hit. This one is a notch or two above ALU Rough as far as comfort is concerned.
Spin
ALU Rough works well for spin, but I didn't think the "rough" added much over a standard poly. I was able to hit with pretty much any level of spin I wanted, and I think the overall balance of characteristics of this string lend themselves to spin production. It's not too powerful, and it has decent feel and control. Taking big cuts at the ball will produce more spin than a slower swing. Kirschbaum Competition's spin production was similar to ALU Rough. I would say that the softness and extra dwell of the string actually produced a little more spin, but it wasn't enough to really stand out more so than other poly's.
Feel
ALU Rough has good feel. The feel is even better when hitting hard, and I think that more than anything else concerning the ALU Rough makes it a good string. When hitting hard you get a better pocketing feel and a sensation of more control rather than less. Volleys even felt good when taking a ball with some pace, but soft shots didn't have much feel so there is a trade off. Kirschbaum Competition has a really nice feel for a poly. It's a little more muted than the ALU, and the strings seem to pocket the ball and give a better sense of the contact. The frame I had strung with the Kirschbaum Competition quickly became my go to frame for matches because of the softer more refined feel. It is really a pleasure to hit with.
String Movement
No string movement to speak of with either string. I maybe straightened strings twice during the test period where I actually noticed movement.
Tension Maintenance
After playing the ALU Rough for about 12 hours I noticed a significant drop in tension. Up until that point tension maintenance seemed quite good. After that point I started hitting shots that were dropping in about 6 to 8 inches long. I had to add even more spin to keep the ball in play. After about 45 minutes of struggling with the additional power I switched to my backup and the difference was immediately noticeable. Control returned. Kirschbaum Competition had no noticeable tension loss before it broke.
Durability
The ALU Rough seems quite durable. It had very little notching at 12 hours of play. The tension loss was bad enough at that point that I wouldn't play any more with it, so I don't know that the durability is all that useful unless you like a low tension to start with maybe. Unfortunately the Kirschbaum Competition was not as durable. It only lasted about 8 hours and broke near the top of the head on a serve. I frequently hit serves high in the head with my normal poly and have only experienced a shear break once after more than 20 stringings. However, for people who can stay away from the top of the frame, the string was barely notched when it broke so it seems durable in that sense. I was seriously considering this string as a replacement for my current poly, but this type of breakage is a deal breaker for me.
Weather/Temperature: Mild. Between 65 and 80 degrees
Court Surface: Hard Court
Final Comments:
Alu Rough and Kirschbaum Competition are both excellent polys. They
are comfortable with good control. The Competition was one of the
best feeling polys I've tried. It was very comfortable and felt great
when hitting hard. Alu Rough had a more crisp feel to it, but was
still a comfortable string. Overall the only complaint I had with
them was longevity. I expect polys to last substantially longer than
multis or synthetic gut strings, but it turned out that these two
didn't last that long. The Competition had a shear break near the top
of the frame after 8 hours and the Alu Rough lost a lot of tension
all at once at about 12 hours of play. So it seems that these two
polys would be used more for the control and feel that they provide
rather than the durability. I could imagine that the Competition
might be great for someone who doesn't break strings frequently
although I don't know what the long term tension holding
characteristics would be. If you like hitting with polys I think
these two are worth a try. The Competition especially if you are
looking for a comfortable poly with good feel.
| Comfort |
| Kirschbaum Competition/17 | 75 |
| Luxilon ALU Power Rough/16L | 70 |
|
| Control |
| Kirschbaum Competition/17 | 85 |
| Luxilon ALU Power Rough/16L | 80 |
|
| Feel |
| Kirschbaum Competition/17 | 80 |
| Luxilon ALU Power Rough/16L | 70 |
|
| Power |
| Luxilon ALU Power Rough/16L | 70 |
| Kirschbaum Competition/17 | 65 |
|
| Spin |
| Luxilon ALU Power Rough/16L | 80 |
| Kirschbaum Competition/17 | 80 |
|
| String Movement |
| Kirschbaum Competition/17 | 95 |
| Luxilon ALU Power Rough/16L | 90 |
|
| Tension Maintenance |
| Kirschbaum Competition/17 | 90 |
| Luxilon ALU Power Rough/16L | 65 |
|
| Overall Playability |
| Kirschbaum Competition/17 | 85 |
| Luxilon ALU Power Rough/16L | 75 |
|
| Playtest date: November, 2006. |
| All content copyright 2006 Tennis Warehouse. |