Comments: Durability is definitely an issue with both the 17 and 16. 16 lasts longer than 17 but I am now debating on whether to make this my string. Compared to RPM blast, it lasts about half as long, but it costs about half the price. But with the cost of stringing, I am still not sure if RPM blast is the better choice or not. It is very stiff, maybe that is why it breaks so much faster.
From: CF, 5/12

Comments: I really love this string! It is a great string, but especially for the price. Very reasonable! I have to say that I am not a string breaker, so my comments on the durability is that it works fine for me. I hit flat, but this gives me so much access to spin that really comes in handy for control. I went with the 17g because I wanted to get more pop and it has plenty enough pop for my liking. My son is an respectable junior who loves rpm blast so I am waiting for him to break his strings so he can try it. If he likes it, we will be buying a reel. Way cheaper than rpm blast! I use the wilson ncode ntour (love that racquet) and strung it at mid plus 2 which is about 57 58 lbs. Perfect!
From: CF, 3/12

Comments: Stringing: Strung on a Alpha CP Drop Weight (6-Point). Coil memory was not much for an issue since I was working from a reel and only using 20 feet. Knots were a easy to deal with since the string was a 17G and on the softer side. While stringing there was some play in the string but I had to make only a few adjustments on my dropweight to obtain proper tension. The edges of the string were a bit on the sharp side and you could feel the 7 sides. Overall stringing experience was quite easy and unremarkable. Power: Really enjoyed the power level of this string. While the power was available it did not cause balls to fly like other higher powered polys. I loved the fact that I could really swing out and get a very true power output based on my swing speed. I tested this string for 12 hours and the power level more or less remained the same. Feel: Feel was not really a strong point of this string for me. I am not much of a feel player in any case as I do not hit many drop shots or drop volleys. Slices and topspin lobs seems to go where I intended them to go but I did not feel overly connected to the stringbed. Feel was average at best, but then again I am not the best judge of this feature. I get a somewhat better sense of feel from BHS 17. The next time I use this string I will drop the tension a few pounds to see I can obtain a little softer feel. Spin Production: Nice tight spin production with this string. Very much a driving, tight heavy spin with wonderful directional and depth control. Compared with my regular set-up and increase of 20% or so. The spin really made the balls hug the court. On serve, balls seemed to explode off the court and pick up speed on contact. Hard slices were just wicked and well as kick serves. Control: Very impressed with the control on this string. My unforced errors were reduced and I could swing out with very little concern for overhitting. The firm and crisp stringbed combined with the great spin production enhanced control. While drilling the ball seemed to be on a string and I was going hitting closer and closer to the lines with confidence. Nice ball pocketing in general at the start of the testing cycle but as the stringbed became softer, ball pocketing moved to the excellent level. Serving: Enjoyed serving with this set-up. As mentioned above, spin based serves were a strong point of this set-up. A bit more effort was involved for me in hitting flat serves. As I worked my way into my hours with this set-up I was getting more out of the flat serves. The string bed did soften and that improved my efforts.
From: Anon, 1/12