|Contribute Your Feedback|
|Click the button below or email email@example.com to contribute your experiences with this product. Although not necessary, it's interesting to have a first name, city, state and country (no email addresses will be used). Any information submitted becomes the property of Tennis Warehouse.|
Please include any relevant information such as skill level and style of play.
Comments: I just ordered a second pair of these shoes because they are so good. I've been disappointed with the
trend in tennis shoes toward hard, mostly plastic uppers that have no give. Frankly, the NB 996 fits in this group. But the 696 still
has some leather in the upper and along with great cushioning provides a very playable, light shoe right out of the box.
Comments: Support is not good. I have never rolled over on my foot until I tried these shoes -- it has happened
twice now. Will not buy again.
Comments: These are my first pair of actual court shoes I bought and I really liked them. They felt great -- I'm
actually buying another pair for everyday use. On court, they felt light, solid, and responsive. They also lasted me one tennis
season, so I feel like they had good durability too. After these died I bought a pair of 996s, and honestly I still think I prefer the
696s, especially considering the price difference.
Comments: I have used and loved the 600 series for years. However, the MC 696 feels completely different than its
predecessors. It is a lot narrower in the toe-box area. The side walls of the toe-box are a lot higher and stiffer. The insole feels
too voluminous and bulky (kind of crowds out your foot). I had to return mine ASAP. The former 600s, in my case, are vastly
Comments: I have worn these shoes for several months. I have a slightly wide foot and bought half a size up. They
wear well, seem to have sufficient cushioning and ventilation. Not a bad shoe for the price.
Comments: I find that these shoes do not have enough cushioning. The insole is very thin and they almost
immediately started hurting the bottom of my feet. I have worn New Balance shoes in the past, but I am disappointed with this
Comments: Being the cheapskate that I am, I wore several different models of New Balance cross-trainer shoes for
tennis prior to taking the plunge and purchasing a pair of New Balance 696. I've also tried some lower-end Nike and Adidas tennis
shoes a while back, but I've found the right fit and feel with the New Balance. Just walking around the house, the 696 surprisingly
a little rigid. They came to life in my first match and perhaps they just needed a little time to break in. I would say that the 696 is
economy version of the 996 with a similar look and last. The mesh keeps this shoe light and breathable, but there's enough
leather in the upper to prevent my feet from shifting around as many mesh-predominant shoes are known for. If you prefer a
more cushioned feel, these shoes are probably not for you. The Abzorb midsole provides a firm response with good rebound, but
they never felt under-cushioned. Like the 996, there is some outsole material protruding on the outskirts of the forefoot which
it a wider footprint and more support. And yes, these are cool looking shoes as I purchased the grey/bright green combo. While
many of the older NB models are popular amongst the senior population with a conservative look, the newer NB models come in
some flashy color schemes. However, if you still desire a conservative color scheme, it's still offered.
|- Where to go from here|
|Related Categories||Similar/Competing Products||Other items to consider|