Click the button below or email email@example.com to contribute your experiences with this product. Although not necessary, it's interesting to have a first name, city, state and country (no email addresses will be used). Any information submitted becomes the property of Tennis Warehouse.
Please include any relevant information such as skill level and style of play.
Comments: I ordered a size too large and they were great on the court. The most comfort out of the box of any
shoe I have ever bought, and perfect fit in the mid foot -- New Balance's size 2E are the only shoes I can wear! Very soft
inserts, and good support. I am ordering another pair right now in my exact size to try them.
From: Ronnie, 7/15
Comments: I have really, really narrow feet and I've told it looks like a foot long hot dog. These 1296 shoes
really tight with painful hotspots on the sides of my foot. I thought about using a pry bar to make them fit.
From: Wes, 4/15
Comments: I too feel a little foolish for buying these shoes without first reading the reviews. They are very
and tight. I'm a long-time New Balance wearer and am surprised they would allow so much variation in the lasts under the
brand without a closer quality check. I'll think again before buying New Balance and am sympathetic to Tennis Warehouse
must be getting lots of returns. These will be going back tomorrow.
From: Arne, 3/15
Comments: I purchased these shoes without reading reviews. My mistake. I have to agree with all comments.
shoe is very narrow for a 2E. The midsole is ridiculously narrow. Comfort is a 2/10. I know sometimes you just have to get
to a new fit however but this was no where near what I was expecting out of a NB tennis shoe. It is hard on you feet and
your arch. I play 3.0/3.5 as much as 3 or 4 days a week on hard and rubico and it was so bad I played in my street shoes.
normally my shoe of choice.
From: Chris, 2/15
Comments: I bought these on cyber Monday and started playing with these shoes on December 2. A mere
weeks later, and the outside of the sole is already worn down to the plastic support on the widest portion of the toe box.
the outside tread is worn completely smooth. I am 59 years old and play mostly doubles. I will send them back to get
Also, the tongue is so short I can barley tie the laces without them touching my socks. Glad TW will honor the New Balance
From: Joel, 1/15
Comments: I have worn New Balance shoes (2E) for more than 15 years. The MC1296 is the worst so far. Very
uncomfortable, too narrow for wide shoes, cheap materials and the worst the outsole that lasted only 3 weeks (I play 3
week). So disappointed
From: Noppadon, 12/14
Comments: Perhaps the worst NB shoe I have ever tried on and wouldn't think of ever attempting to wear
court. Really odd fit compared the old lasts they used to use, cheap materials and didn't look well constructed. Frankly,
seen a decent NB shoe since the 1002. Just sad what NB has become.
From: Anon, 10/14
Comments:I have worn nothing but New Balance size 9EE shoes for more than a decade. Either the shoes
me were mislabeled, or these are by far the narrowest double E shoes New Balance has ever created. I held them up to my
9EE shoes and the difference in width was striking.
From: Rick, 8/14
Comments: I have worn New Balance Tennis Shoes for a long time. The 2E width in this shoe does feel
anything New Balance has ever produced. It is a closer fit in the midfoot area as described -- but the shoe fits true to size!
fit in the midfoot keeps your foot very stable in the shoe and prevents slipage. I do not mind the tongue being shorter than
models. The top laces come very close to the top of the tongue -- but the tongue stays in place and there is no problem.
From: Larry, 3/14
Comments: I have been wearing 1004s and 1005s for some time in 8 1/2 2E. I just ordered this shoe and am
them back as this model is narrower than previous New Balance versions. In addition, the tongue is shorter than previous
and thus the knotted shoe lace is almost at the top of the tongue.
From: Hamid, 2/14