Volkl C10 Pro Racquets Customer feedback
|Contribute Your Feedback|
|Click the button below or email firstname.lastname@example.org to contribute your experiences with this product. Although not necessary, it's interesting to have a first name, city, state and country (no email addresses will be used). Any information submitted becomes the property of Tennis Warehouse.|
Please include any relevant information such as string type and tension, skill level and style of play.
Comments: Got this stick just to keep in the bag as a throwback to a nostalgia racquet. Yes, I remember Petr Korda
well. As it turns out, as others have said, this racquet makes many newer sticks seem like flimsy toys. It is hard to generate spin,
but that is not its intended strength. It is also hard to hit wristy flick shots on the run, like on low short balls. But when you set up
properly, it is simply awesome. I am crushing the ball with this baby. Will it replace my more "modern" racquets? Perhaps not in
the long run as I am an aging (51 years old) 4.5, but I am really enjoying serves, volleys, returns and monster groundies for the
time being. FYI, I also bought a re-issue Prince Graphic Classic 100 longbody which I am enjoying equally well for similar reasons.
Oldies but goodies, I am finding heft to be a long lost friend on the court.
Comments: After lots of racquet experimentation, I still haven't found a better frame than the C10 Pro, at least for
me. Everything else feels like a hollow toy after becoming acclimated to the stability and plow of this sweet stick. Even the PB10
Mid felt light and unstable to me compared with the C10. As recent comments have stated, it's not for everybody due to the
weight but once you become addicted to this classic frame, it's hard to go to anything else without comparing back to this one. I
believe the 12+ ounce weight is a blessing in disguise because it forces you to think about starting your swing early and using
correct technique. You can't be late and try to flick this frame around with your wrist like a 10 oz racquet. Correct form is
rewarded with heavy, deep shots. Last but not least the C10 is very arm friendly with the correct string setup.
Comments: I have played with the PB 10 Mid during the last years and would like to replace the racquet with a more
forgiving racquet with similiar characteristics. I played both of these side by side with the same string and tension. The C10 Pro
was approx. 10 grams heavier (although the weight should be the same). The swingweight of the C10 is also higher. This was also
my impression. For me, the racquet is too heavy and therefore not an alternative for the PB.
Comments: I'm like a lot of other people who got this racquet just because of Chris, and this is the racquet that I
disagree most with him. I got this as a larger headsized racquet since I usually play with the Volkl Mids. Perhaps it's because I
haven't had the chance to restring as many times as him with a poly at higher tension I disagree so much. So, in comparison with
his other racquets, the PB 10 Mid and Wilson Six.One 95s, I also have the X10. I find this racquet the hardest to swing, but I think
it could be because of the weight. I tried everything from TW University to match the specs I had on my PB 10s (with leather grips)
as much as possible but this one just is still difficult to wield. Even the Wilson weighted to the same specs as this one is much
easier to swing, which maybe I really do have to bump up the tension. The one thing though I would say is that the feel is nothing
like the X10 or the PB10. This doesn't feel silky or buttery like the PB10 or as as crisp as the X10. Maybe because I am feeling the
weight, I'd say this feels like I was hitting with a thick piece of wood or more clubby as other playtesters commonly say. This
translates into a bit of an uncomfortable feeling in my wrist, which is probably due to my swing style. I think it also doesn't allow
as much access to spin, but again, could be due to my swing style. So, i'd rather play with the 95s if i'm looking for that. You get
power from that one from the swing speed. So, all in all, this has been a disappointing racquet. I'd recommend the PB and X10
Mids and the 95S over this one.
Comments: All I can say it is this is a great racquet! It may not be for everybody, and it may feel too flexy and heavy
for some. But, in my opinion, it gives you a lot of confort, (I had Tennis Elbow) and enough power and stability on every shot!
Comments: Love this stick. Played with the PS 6.0 85 for years, but felt I needed to make the change to a bigger
head size, like everybody else. Also wanted a stick close to the feel of the PS 6.0 85. Found the specs of this racquet to be in the
ball park, so I purchased it. I can't say enough about it and its arm friendliness. I have since demoed several other player sticks,
including the Babolat APD, the Federer autograph, and the Blade 98 18x20, and always go back to my C10 Pro. The feel is just
better. I string it up with Cyclone 17 mains at 56 lbs, and Klip Legend 16 gut crosses at 59 lbs. You can't beat this combination. I
also put Volkl leather grip on it. NTRP rating 4.0+
Comments: To Andrew on 7/13 -- I could not agree more with your review. The only additional point I would like
to add is that while the C10 Pro is a slightly heavier frame stock than the Melbourne the latter feels a lot more stable at net and
against hard shots maybe due to the full cap grommet and I found it was much easier to half volley/take shots on the rise. They
are both great sticks in their own right though.
Comments: Very smooth -- I had to add very fine lead strips to 9, 10, 11, 12, 1, 2, 3 o'clock because it was so head
light compared to my Head Radical Pro IG, Wilson PS 90 with amplifeel and a PS 85. Also, I had to lower the tension from 66 lbs
(with Biophase) to a hybrid at 54 lbs Bio as crosses and a poly in the mains. It hits much different from the V1 Classic and I think
that I liked that more. I have to see if the added lead will improve it. Good luck in looking for your perfect racquet.
Comments: This is the best racquet I've ever played with and I've been playing tennis for 35 years. Unfortunately I
bought into all the Babolat hype since the early 2000s and wound up ruining my arm. If racquets were compared to cars, the C10
pro is a high end sports car, whereas all other racquets are Hondas. That being said, if you have arm problems, I would stay away
from high-tensioned polys like Chris from TW recommends. I've tried many string set-ups and my sweet spot was Technifibre
NRG2 at 55lbs for a super plush arm-friendly set-up that still delivers tons of control and power. The only problem with the C10
is that it's heavy. So you have to be strong to wield it. If you have the strength, it will be the last racquet you ever need to buy.
Comments: Switched from IG Prestige MP as I was looking for something with extreme comfort and a more open
string pattern. I did not like the Prestige Pro as much and wanted to give this one a try. I have been very pleased with the
performance. I have given up a few MPH on serve but the feel I get all over the court is excellent and its a lot more forgiving. I
have been stringing mine with TopSpin Cyber Blue at 55lbs. and that seems to real dial it in for me. I tried Gut mains and CB
crosses but the power was a little high on serve return and approaches. I might try going up a little bit more in tension because
the racket is very arm friendly. For those that might be scared of the weight, I find this racket to be really fast through the zone
and pretty whippy. I ordered an old C10 Pro from the mid 90's and the thing was a clunker and extremely slow. Volkl has done a
nice job of making this more modern and fast while still giving huge stability you would expect from a racquet at 12.5
ounces. USTRP 4.5 all court player.
Comments: Sorry, I promise this is my last comment here. Without a question, this racquet is very string sensitive
and tension sensitive. The first one I bought I had it strung at 57 lbs (Cyclone 16). I really liked the tension for the first 20
minutes, but then it felt a little harsh as the other reviewer said (I guess the strings move more freely when fresh). To put things in
perspective, I only have a 40 degree rotation in my elbow, caused by an injury when I was young. Eventually, I had it restrung
down to 50 lbs. The first few minutes the strings felt "unsettled," but then started playing absolutely phenomenal at 50 lbs with
no elbow pain and I could swing as fast as I wanted. If I had the luxury of a pro-player and could use a newly strung racquet every
20 minutes, then 57 lbs would have worked just fine, but I think 48-50 lbs is a perfect match for this for longer keep. Also,
adjustments need to be made for the type of balls (extra duty versus regular duty) and type of surface. I am on my third racquet. I
will keep two at 50 lbs for outdoors, and maybe one at 52-53 lbs for indoors.
Comments: I know that everybody will disagree with me but, I think the racquet feels very harsh and stiff. Maybe it
is the Kevlar in it? Or maybe my stringing preferences are just too tight for this frame. I frequently feel elbow pain when using it. I
have used the Yonex RD Ti-80, Prince Graphite Mid, and Boris Becker 11 325 and never felt any pain in the elbow when using
similar string setups. Yes the racquet plays great, but for whatever reason when strung with poly at a reasonably high tension
doesn't offer near the comfort of those other frames. I'm disappointed because I really wanted to like this frame. I think I'm going
to try something a little more flexible, maybe the Pro Kennex Redondo.
Comments: A follow-up comment. Not just a fantastic racquet, but, in my opinion, it is simply the best ever made.
Just wish I was a better player to match its unlimited potential. I just ordered another one.
Comments: This is a fantastic racquet. I was fortunate to get the first one on discount, but willing to get the second
one at full price. I would like to thank Mr. Chris Edwards for his great comments and demo. Normally, I replace the grip with a
leather one, but this is the first racquet which I decided to keep with the original grip after trying the leather. The balance of this
is just perfect for my style of play. I see Chris hitting a flat shot (much better player than I) and I hit with top spin, yet this racquet
works with both styles. The tension I use now is 53 lbs with Volkl Cyclone 16.
Comments: Had a demo form TW Europe, together with a X10 Mid, comparing both to my current BB Melbourne (3g
of lead at 12:00). The X10 is beyond my ability limits, so no comments on that one. This C10 Pro has a super soft response
without being wobbly and low powered. Topspin is really amazing. Generous sweet spot. The BB Melbourne is definitely
crisper+/stiffer- and lower in power. The sweet spot is smaller and lower in the string bed with the Melbourne. The C10 is easier
and more fun to play with. When you play with concentration and decision, the BB Melbourne has more offensive options: you can
flatten your shots with control, you can hit extremely nasty slices, volleys/half volleys are much more stable, drop shots are
deadly. Mercedes (C10 Pro) vs. BMW (BB Mel).
Comments: I can't believe how good this stick feels. Buttery is definitely the term for it. Coming from using the
Prince Original Graphite Oversize, I never thought that I'd be writing a review on a C10 Pro. What an underdog of all racquets. I
was trying popular sticks like Wilson, Babolat & Head with no avail. The C10 Pro is like the POS OS, but with much more comfort
and feel. It also feels much lighter with the 8 points head light balance without losing the plow through to put volleys away. Shots
are less loopy than the POG OS. I am still experimenting with strings and tensions. At the moment had it strung with syn gut at
Comments: Great Racquet! I am over 60 and sold my C10 Pros to find something lighter and more modern. After
playing with the stiff Babolots, Wilsons and others, I went back and strung up two Prince Woodies at 70lbs with poly. I won several
matches but no one wanted to play against a wood racquet. I went back to the 6.0 MP and strung it up at 56 lbs with poly and
played well but had no power. While on vacation I rented a C10 and won 5 sets in 3.5 hours. Why did I sell them? I bought 3 and
am playing great never to change. They are heavy but I'm not suffering from arm fatigue.
Comments: I just got the C10 in a round of demos. It was my "throw away" choice. As in, I get a 4th racquet, so
whatever. Wow, am I glad I picked it! So far it is the best racquet in the bunch.
Comments: This is a great player's racquet. I have been searching for a racquet for a little over two years now to
replace my Head Prestige Midplus and nothing gave me the feel I was looking for. Several people recommended this racquet to me
and Chris Edwards does a nice job summarizing this racquet. I enjoyed this racquet due to its soft, buttery feel and ability to plow
through the ball in order to put shots away. I will admit, the type of string you put in this racquet and the tension makes this
racquet play in different ways, which I like because it allows me to manipulate the racquet based on how I am playing recently,
weather, and other conditions. Overall, this racquet suits an all-around player who is able to hit a variety of shots with control and
Comments: Finally, I managed to hit with this highly recommended stick by Chris Edwards, one of the senior
TennisWarehouse playtesters. Read his review here. By the way, there were also quite a few supporters of Volkl sticks on the
Tennis Malaysia and Malaysia Tennis Lovers facebook groups. I received the stock on Monday and noted that the unstrung weight
should be 330g and balance at 310mm. I took out my trusty digital weighing machine and was shocked that the unstrung weight
was only 317g. Wow, a 13g difference. I had expected a +/- 1g difference as experienced with my Bio 100, 200L, 200 (2) and
300. I posted this at the TW forum on receiving my Dunlop Black Widow 18g string. I had it strung yesterday and the final specs
are: strung weight : 331g (as compared to the advertised 346g), balance: 9.76pt HL (as compared to the advertised 8pt HL). I
posted a question to Chris Edwards on the TW Forum to seek advice on how to lead up to the advertised specs. I started my
playtest as usual with serves. Flat and slice serves were nice and crisp, but I had some issues getting my kick serves to bounce
higher than shoulder height. I managed to get my kick serve back but had to really get under the ball. BH volleys were very solid,
probably due to its high twistweight of 14.16. The FH came with lots of spin and I was able to easily hit with depth. Backhand
topspin was also easy to hit with depth, and BH Slices were hit pretty crisp and low. On the flip side, static overheads were not so
Comments: I absolutely love Volkl raquets. I have been playing with the Organix 8 for past year and my game
improved tremedously due its power and spin potential. However, the Organix line has an annoying grip that contributes to
occasional erratic long shots. I demo'ed the C10 Pro and overall it's a 10/10! Great power, control, spin, and consistency. My
volleys and serve/overheads are improved magically too. All Volkl's are comfortable but this one is very comfortable. I have a
1HBH and it's much improved since I know that solid technique will be consistently rewarded. I ordered 3 with Black Widow Dunlop
17g at 55 lbs. A good poly at mid racquet tension is best for these racquets just like the Organix line. Enjoy it. I also love the
cosmetics and the immediate "solid " feel.
Comments: I like it. I'm coming from a POG mid. At first I found the C10 too sluggish and too powerful to use
successfully, so I leaded up my POG to match the C10's weight. After playing with the leaded up POG for a couple of weeks the
transition to the C10 was smooth as butter. Now I've got a bit more stability, more plowthrough, much more pace, a bigger serve,
and it's a little bit easier to control as well. It's good for flat shots but I haven't been able to get as much spin out of it (to be fair,
the POG is unmatched in terms of spin). Overall it feels like a bit more solid, more resolved, flexier POG mid. I love the feel and
pocketing on this stick. The 2012 paintjob is relatively classy as well. Looks great with a leather grip.
Comments: I posted a question on the TW boards: For a person who loves the Prince Original Graphite Oversize,
what would be the perfect racquet with a slightly smaller headsize? This was the most recommended racquet. I love it, maybe
even more than the POG OS. Solid and stable like the POG OS but, for me at least, a bit easier to get through the ball on serve and
more maneuverable and precise at the net.
Comments: I stopped dreaming of a flexible POG Midplus 98 (the horrible
EXO3 100 doesn't count) and pulled the trigger on this C10 Pro instead.
It is a supremely comfortable and stable player's stick that strikes a
satisfactory balance between heft and maneuverability. The enduring C10
Pro nameplate deserves to be spoken in the same breath as the PS85, POG
and PC600 but why does Volkl dubiously subject this frame to the
indignity of near-annual cosmetic updates that serve only to alienate
longtime fans and turn-off potential customers with ugly PJs? Like a
botoxed, aging cougar suffering relevance deprivation, the yellow paint
on the inner hoop is an unnecessary aberration on an otherwise elegant
Comments: I think the C10 Pro now compares with Wilson Pro Staff 6.0 and Prince
Original Graphite. I don't know exactly when the first edition was but
the C10 in on the market for at least 10 years now. I think it will hold
for another 10 years. The Bumblebee paintjob is my most favorite and
hope they will bring it back.
|Volkl C10 Pro Racquets - Where to go from here|