Click the button below or email email@example.com to contribute your experiences with this product. Although not necessary, it's interesting to have a first name, city, state and country (no email addresses will be used). Any information submitted becomes the property of Tennis Warehouse.
Please include any relevant information such as string type and tension, skill level and style of play.
Comments: Definitely better than the previous version in terms of offering more feel and ball pocketing. Very
quick to swing. But I wish it has a bit more weight to handle the heavier ball from opponent. I know you can add weight to
it. But somehow adding weight doesnt feel as good as a factory racquet which is heavier. I don't know why.
From: Mark, 12/15
Comments: I bought this racquet about 6-7 months ago. I also felt this racquet in stock form was a little
ended up adding a bit of lead tape to the 3 and 9 position in the head and the instability has gone away. I strung it with
Sensation Control at mid range which seems to play pretty nice.
From: Paul, 1/15
Comments: As a 4.0 adult defensive baseliner, I really love this racquet. I've had it for about three weeks now,
it has allowed me to easily play much more offense. The 16x19 string pattern, for me, seems to easily provide pace and
without much effort. I hit a topspin forehand but occasionally flatten it out, and this racquet really rewards a well hit flat
and my very consistent backhand is now hit with good pace and depth. Where this racquet really wins for me though is on
serve. Definitely gained 10-15 mph with it and I get it in 20% more. Volleys are good and reliable and hit with good feel. If
there's one criticism so far I have is that I can't slice reliably with it yet, but that's more than offset by the benefits I've
From: Carlos, 12/14
Comments: I have had an extended playtest with both the Pure Strike 16x19 and the Wilson Blade 16x19
the same in spec in every category). First with the racquets strung at the middle of their respective recommended tension
(55 lbs for the Blade, 58 lbs for the PS -- both with Wilson NXT Tour). Then both at 58 lbs with Ashaway Cross Fire 18. The
verdict: The PS feels more solid and you can hit a heavier ball, the slice is especially amazing (despite both racquets have
the same spec). Having said that, if you are a traditional player who hits a flatter ball and a slice (like me), you will like the
more. It reminds me of the Wilson 95, which I have played with all my life. If you are a modern heavy top spin player, you
the Blade 98 more. It has more power but a bit less control (and as I said the ball feels less heavy). Finally, I think if you put
polys in both racquets, then I think the Blade may play very well and the PS may be a bit dead (I haven't tried it, just my
From: Mark, 12/14
Comments: Been on a losing streak ever since I got this racquet. My other racquet is the Tour BLX which gives
forehands some added power. This racquet makes my flat forehands powerless and "sit" right there for my opponents to
on. My defense got a little better with this racquet but since I'm not da defensive player, this racquet my not be for me.
Blade does not give me much option but to play with spin. I think I'm going back to my Tour BLX if my ground strokes
"sit" with this racquet.
From: JP, 11/14
Comments: I've played with the Blade 98 (16x19) for about a month. As others have said, in stock form, it was
unstable. Also, I found it quite jarring, stiff and hollow (using a soft poly). I brought it up to 345 grams strung by adding
the handle and a leather grip -- it feels much more solid with better feel for the ball. This obviously made it more headlight,
which I found beneficial. Still a bit stiff though, I got a bit of an arm pain which I never had before. Thinking about adding a
of grams at 3 and 9 too see if this issue could be improved just a bit. The racquet provides good access to spin and power,
forgiving, and I find it suitable for my all-court game. I find the control to be average, while at the same time being limited
lower string tensions (see below). Disagree with others who call it a rocket launcher. The feel is decent (following
it is nowhere near a Pro Staff as some have alluded to. Rather it is on the crisper side. I find the racquet balances a very
of being too stiff (and hurting my arm), I feel as if I need as soft poly as possible (and might try going hybrid) and keep it
50 lbs, else it gets boardy. I am a previous junior competitive player returning to tennis after 10+ years off, guess I'm 4.5
From: Bona, 11/14
Comments: Felt a little flimsy until I changed to a leather grip. Very maneuverable inspite of its swing weight; a
control oriented racquet that has some pop. I love the topspin the racquet generates. Currently stringing it with a full bed
filament. Bi phase 16g at 55 lbs. Will string it with a poly next time. Not so good for slicing but my defense is better than
previous racquet. Great racquet overall. I am almost 40, and a 5.0 player.
From: Patrick, 10/14
Comments: Attention all Pro Staff lovers. I have found the greatest racquet ever, and yes I know Federer's new
racquet will be similar. If you want a PS feel, control racquet with extra power on a 98 inch head, buy this racquet, but lead
in the handle to bring it to 12 points HL and 12.7 ounces strung, and you will never play another racquet in your life! I have
strung with Luxilon Savage at 53 pounds and I can do anything with it, power, control, forgiveness, spin, I can do anything
this set up. I'm never buying a racquet again, this one is perfect.
From: Mike, 8/14
Comments: This racquet is a ton of fun to just hit with. Every ball was going deep but I had little control with it.
found I had to change my swing to keep the ball in the court but I loved the easy power for just hitting around, but in a
so much. The extra power helped my 2 handed backhand and it also has lots of plow through and you can solidly return
serves with little effort. The Blade's beam shape makes for crisp feeling volleys. I might have to demo the 18x20 version.
From: Steve, 8/14
Comments: Reviews are only valid if you know how Is doing the evaluation. I'm a old school (38 years old, 5.5
flat hitter whose all time favorite racquet is PS 90. It is the best racquet ever made for accuracy and control. Being
needing more power and forgiveness, two years ago I moved to 6.1 95, love it. Pushing the envelope, wanted something
more powerful, but most important factor is control. I've tried everything -- name it, APD, PD, found these to be baseline
bomb droppers, good, but not for my game, I generate a ton of power, Head, again, just about every racquet. I had tried
Blade and wasn't impressed. So I demoed the 93, and the 16x19 and 18x20, "16" from here on in. The 93 was great at
hitting partner was blown away, I was like 95% first serves in, he couldn't handle it, but again in fast play just not forgiving
(I suffer many injuries, hard to keep in shape), so demoed the 16 and the 18. Reading TW reviews I expected the 18
to be the one, and although terrific, it was very low powered. The 16, as others have said, has everything you can want,
power, forgiveness, maneuverability, I kept looking for a flaw but couldn't find one. So I bought one! If you want control,
again everyone is different, but use RPM Blast or what I used, Lux Rough at 50 pounds. The dwell time is fantastic, the
super accurate, so I have a large head size for forgiveness, power in the racquet, control with the strings, and just enough
to spin. I had though of weighting it in the handle to replicate the PS specs, but I'm not going to do it. Coming around say
backhand (I use single), the PS is great and steady of course, however the Blade whips around fast, and that heavy head
the ball, the result is a quicker and more powerful movement to the backhand with the steadiness of a PS. So yea, love the
testers, but I think they got it wrong on this one, perhaps they used the wrong string, you definitely need a deader string in
opinion. So great racquet, don't let TW reviewers influence you, test it yourself. NOTE: If you demo from TW, it can take a
days before being ready to ship, so if you are in a hurry go to your pro shop. I did buy mine from TW. I really love the extra
without sacrificing control, run wide to barely get a backhand ball, just stick that racquet out there and barely catch it and
going over, much better than having to miss because I'm using a heavy smaller head. Alright, enough from me! Also, my 13
old son is still stuck using a 6.1 95, he's a winner in USTA, I'm going to "convert" him to the Blade, he thinks it's heresy as
and the equal specs of the 6.1 95 have such a venerable heritage.
From: Anon, 7/14
Comments: An amazing tennis racquet, super comfortable on the arm, easy to play with! Maneuverability was
reaching optimum levels, it really is a great racquet! I've got it strung with the Wilson Sensation, and I'm finding it perfect.
it lost tension in 8 hours. I'm thinking of switching to Luxilon Big Banger Rough.
From: Yousif, 5/14
Comments: Great racquet. Very easy to handle and hit aggressively with. More power and spin than the
still has great feel and control. Did not enjoy this racquet for serves, but loved it on everything else
From: Mike, 5/14
Comments: I have owned the BLX Blade 93 (first), Blade 98S (second), and now this one. I have also hit
times with the 18x20 so at this point I'm familiar with the whole line. I should add that I transitioned from playing with the
Factor 6.1 Tour 90 so I was looking for something a little more playable as I approach my mid-40s. I liked the feel and
the 93, but it was a little too much like the 6.1 (great racquet though). The 98S was way too light and loose for me. I
control it. I playtested the 18x20 a bit and it was a nice transition, but I hoped that the 16x19 pattern would feel more like
6.1 with that open string pattern and larger frame. I have strung it with Wilson's Champion's Choice at 55 lbs (gut)/52 lbs
couple times and it's a decent compromise and has some of the qualities I'm looking for, but it's still way too lively. I read
review that called it a rocket launcher and that's how I feel a bit. I'm curious about adding some weight to help with the
see Zaw's comments below. 1 pts HL seems so light. I'm thinking I should add something to try and recreate "PWS." Any
comments would be welcomed. I do know I'm going to up the tension slightly. Maybe 58/55 lbs. I guess I'm just waiting
new Fed racquet to hit the market. I'll follow up and let you know how it goes with the new customization on the 16x19.
From: John, 5/14
Comments: I have been playing with original Wilson Pro Staff 6.0 95" racquet for so many years and tried
every newer Wilson Pro Staff series when they came out, because I want more power and control with newer technology.
them came close to Original Pro Staff and I always go back to my old stick. As funny as it may sound since this is not
series, this plays quite similar to original ProStaff 6.0 with a some customization. I added 4 x 2" of 1/2" lead tape on the
Wilson Leather grip, and 2 x 2" of lead tape on the throat. This became my dream racquet. Lighter head with better
maneuverability. Try it and let me hear what you think if you are Pro Staff fan. Use Wilson Champion Choice with Natural
the main 48lb, Luxilon Rough on cross 46 lb. You might have to tweek the tension based on your game. Plow though is
Spin is very easy with open pattern and balls are deeper, heavier due to added weight. Hope this helps.
From: Zaw, 4/14
Comments: Surprisingly good stick! I think that I've found a replacement for my Hyper ProStaff 95, that's just
heavy and small headed for me. Don't know what TW is saying, re: 16 vs 18 mains on these. If you check Federer, he's
with 98 sq in head and 16 mains and he's doing pretty well. For me, the flex at 66 is right on and the stick feels like a
more forgiving ProStaff 95. Serves are very good, as well as the forehand and backhand, both control and spin are there. I
the extra spin and power from the 16 mains version. Strung mine with Spiky Shark at the lower end of the range and it
great! Probably going to get one or two more for back-ups.
From: Jim, 4/14
Comments: Players who have played with Wilson control racquets all their life will appreciate this stick . Great
control but in a larger racquet (lets face it, when Federer cant play with his 90 square inches, normal players cant
well in the 95 square inches against the hard hitters with loads of top spin today). Somehow, there is more control than the
on the market, but a lot more forgiving than the 95s.
From: Anon, 1/14
Comments: My first "players" racquet and I am loving it. The spin, the plow through and sleek cosmetics -- it's
in this 98 square inch package. I've strung mine up with Signum Pro Poly Plasma and Signum Pro Tornado at 53lbs. If you
handle the high swing weight, make sure to try it out!
From: JP, 12/13
Comments: I recently got this racquet and all I can say is wow! The racquet offered great spin and control. I'm
player who stays at the baseline and for me this racquet is amazing. The control it gave me combined with my power
angled flat shots that no one could return. I have no idea why TW didn't give it a better review as I feel it is better than the
and recommend it to any intermediate to advanced player. I am a 13 year old teen and about to move to 5.0 because of
From: Sruthik, 12/13
Comments: I went from the Prince Warrior, which I played with for alittle over a year to the Blade 98. I had a
trouble at first finding the right string and tension, but I finally settled in on Wilson RipSpin 17ga strung at 53 lbs. This is a
racquet with plenty of pop and control. No matter who I have given this racquet to to try, they've loved it. I'm looking to
buy a 3rd
From: Tom, 12/13
Comments: I'm going to put this very simply for you -- this is an awesome racquet. I went through a number of
racquets before coming back to the Blade 98 (16x19). To me, it has everything you can possible ask for from a racquet --
stability, power, spin, easy on the arm, and it's well balanced. I like to string at low (52 lbs) tension and with a poly like
Kirschbaum Spiky Shark, this racquet delivers, and it delivers big! Seriously, I can not recommend this racquet highly
From: George, 11/13
Comments: Updating my previous comment from 7/13, where I wrote that I would like a lighter version -- this
turned out not to be the case. What happened is that the racquet I received (not from TW, as I am not presently in the US)
304g (unstrung) as the specification but 343g (strung). Allowing 13-15g for strings, the racquet was about 330g. I
Wilson and the usual manufacturing tolerance is about 7g, so it was far out of spec. And if it is that far off, one can only
what the balance was. Now, I received a replacement, and this one is exactly the correct mass. Other than a bit of
plays beautifully -- sharp and precise, but yet with good power and it is balanced nicely. I would go so far as to say that
the best racquet (for me) that I have ever had. I looked around the web and came across other people reporting the same
problem. So my advice to Wilson is -- step up quality control -- weighing the racquet after production would be the most
and obvious check! To potential purchasers: this racquet is highly recommended, but ask the vendor to weigh it before
it up for you!
From: Johnson, 10/13
Comments: Demoed it today -- wow! Much better than the previous version -- very powerful (vs. my BLX 95,
Technifibre Xone 17) but with good control. The power can be easily tamed by string tension adjustments. Having been a
fan all my life, this retains the Wilson feel and is forgiving for me who is now a half step slower, and few pounds heavier.
what I am looking for (good control with more power).
From: Mark, 9/13
Comments: I have this racquet and I absolutely love it. I suggest buying it if you need a new one, it has a great
From: Anthony, 7/13
Comments: I demoed this racquet along with several others with similar specs and this is my favorite. I play
school tennis and play in some tournaments as well and consider myself a 4.5 level player. As soon as I hit a ball with this
I could tell that it was a good stick. The feel is amazing and I like how the weight is balanced. I feel very connected to all
shots. The 16x19 pattern is perfect for my spin oriented game and for some reason I hit my backhand a lot cleaner with
racquet. I also like the racquet at net though I'd have to say this is its weakest point. My volleys don't feel quite as crisp
compared to other racquets but the blade's ability on serve makes up for it. It adds a little spin and pace to my serve and
all the other shots it feels great to hit a serve with this racquet. Also putting balls away is a joy with this racquet. I have
control on approaches and the spin keeps the ball in. All in all, this is a great racquet for players wwho love spin and want
control oriented racquet with a little bit of bite too. I plan to buy this racquet and string it about mid tension with a low
poly in order to enhance the control.
From: Aaron, 7/13
Comments: I first demoed this racquet and loved it. All of my strokes were greatly improved. So I decided to
the player package with three racquets. I knew that Wilson's quality control was bad, but I didn't think it was going to be
Two of the racquets I received were 12.0 ounces strung. The other was 11.65 strung. Considering the specs say 11.2
strung, I am
pretty disappointed. Just wish Wilson had better quality control.
From: Anon, 7/13
Comments: I know there are mixed reviews for this 16x19 version, but I must say that I am in love with it. I've
playing with all sorts of Blades and this one is the best. For those who have some issues in the first trial, I recommend
up the tension by 5-10 lbs than your usual setting for 18x20 pattern. Customizing it with a little lead tape may be another
but I like the way it is manufactured because it feels more maneuverable than my other blades with some lead tapes.
it is really worth giving a second look at this one with higher tensions and you will be writing a very strong and positive
here like I am doing now!
From: Phil, 7/13
Comments: Previous Blade 98s have been too low powered, stiff and heavy for me. This one is great, precise,
steady on volleys, and has more power than the 18x20 version. Still slightly too high of a swing weight for me, a bit more
headlight balance or a few grams less weight would make it just right.
From: Johnson, 7/13
Comments: This racquet feels like a regular Blade racquet on steroids! The 16x19 string pattern really livens
the Blade 98, which allows for greater power and a softer feel than the 98 18x20 and 93 versions. Groundstrokes can be hit
good depth and spin almost without effort, volleys can be placed deep with authority, and all types of serves are a breeze
to hit at
high speeds. The Blade 98, regardless of string pattern, is also highly maneuverable for a "player's racquet" as well as
stable from any area on the court, making this a perfect racquet for the competitive 3.0 and up level player. However, this
racquet's power level does make it tempting to go for outright winners, reducing your accuracy and depth control
the same time though, the more you go for your shot with this racquet, the more it rewards you. It could just be me but that
the most noticeable factor I discovered about this version of the Blade 98. Bottom line is that I bought two of these bad
am highly pleased with the way they play. My favorite Blade by far! I am about a 4.0 level all-court player with a one-
String type and tension: Luxilon 4g 1.25/Gosen OG Sheep Micro 16 at 52 lbs
Comments: Disappointed with this racquet. I played with the NBlade 98 and liked the KBlade as well, but this
racquet feels completely different, much more flimsy for lack of a better word, very similar to the Head Radicals. Maybe the
open string pattern doesn't agree with me, but I traded it in for the APD '13 and haven't looked back as the APD is a much
racquet for me!
From: John, 6/13
Comments: I found great control with this racquet. It has predictable and even power throughout the string
One thing is for sure, the faster your hit, the better this racquet is for you. You have to be in command of your stroke, if you
not hit the ball this racquet won't reward you. But all in all, fine frame, comfortable, lots of control and power, plenty of
again, not a recreational frame. A good poly at moderate tension suits this racquet well or a nice hybrid.
From: Jim, 5/13
Comments: I really wanted to love this racquet, but I couldn't. The feel was excellent, power was good, the
looks awesome, and I loved how much spin I could get with it. But the thing I hated was the lack of control. When it came
put the ball away, the ball would just trampoline off the stringbed and sail way out. It was just too frustrating, so I went
Graphene Speed Pro instead.
From: Jonathan, 4/13
Comments: Not sure if it is the weight or balance, but I couldn't get any pace on my serves. Switched to the
and probably added 15mph.
From: Matthew, 4/13
Comments: I am probably an upper 4.5 junior player that plays a baseline game but will also serve and volley
have a good all around game. This is without a doubt the best racquet i have ever played with good power, spin, stability,
through and maneuverability. Contrary to TW house reviews, the racquet is also great on serves, returns and definitely
Unfortunately the racquet is too stiff for me, after switching from the 62 stiffness of the Head YT IG Radical MP I got back
shoulder and elbow problems after a few weeks of playing.
From: Lucas, 3/13
Comments: Not much I can add that's new to what others have already said. This is a well made, rock solid
with nice plow, that hits very big (and yet retains good control), and has a certain rich plush superb impact feel. For me, it's
slight step up away from powerful lighter raqts into the player's frame realm. Good form (as always) is required to extract
from the 16x19 Blade, but it's easier than a lot of true player's frames. It's the type of raqt that once you set it in motion, it
care of the ball all by itself. And on a closing note, I'll point out that IMO the cosmetics are top class and very attractive.
From: RK, 3/13
Comments: I feel that a second review is in order. After using this racket for about a fortnight now, I have to
nothing feels as good. The steam 99 S could not compare to the control and stability of this racquet. The Six Ones don't
through the air as fast as this. I used VS 17 gut at 60 pounds and RPM 17 at 56 pounds. If you are looking for a higher end
weight, leave it as it is. If you want more of an all round stick, buy it one size down and put a heat sleeve on. After going
over 10+ racquets and 20+ string set-ups, I think I can finally stay with this.
From: Ryan, 2/13
Comments: Everything about this racquet is great except for one major factor - stiffness. I'm a 40 year old
with arm issues and I would have bought this racquet if it were a little more flexible. I hope that Wilson will make more
rackets in the future.
From: Alan, 2/13
Comments:Comparing this to the new Steam 99S, it offers so much racquet head speed, stability, power, and
Not as much as the steam, obviously, but you get more control. Initially I wanted to buy the 3/8 version, but after feeling
swing weight, I decided to buy the 1/4 and make it bigger and more headlight by adding a heat sleeve. It really is a cut
From: Ryan, 2/13
Comments:This racket with the 16x19 stringbed is a game changer and unlike any of the previous Blades. I
is a game improvement AND players frame, all rolled into one. It has the classic feel and nice weight of a players frame
the right amount of controllable free power and spin that you would expect in a lighter frame. I tried several of the heavier
like the Pure Storm Tour/Wilson Six-one and lighter frames like the Juice 108 - this frame has the best of both worlds. It is
dream from all areas of the court, its super solid yet comfortable and I have already seen improvements in all of my
a hybrid set up it is also really easy on my arm which was a major concern for me. I think Wilson got this perfect - weight,
balance, control, power - for all of us all-court players.
From: Joseph, 2/13
Comments: Really enjoying the 16x19 version. Having played with the Juice 100, and testing the new Steams,
just don't compare with feel and plowthrough of this Blade. Imagine if a strung Blade had a SW of around 317 instead of
it was 4 HL instead of 1, well that's what I just ordered using the TW matching service. Not sure what my first one is
the specs on my new one seem perfect. Maybe a little quicker handling? Not that handling is an issue but looking forward
new one. Also, I did try the 18x20 version but preferred the very little extra pop of the 16x19.
From: Dan, 1/13
Comments: I don't know why so many people said this racquet is bad or said something bad about it. It's a
perfectly good racquet. I used the BLX ProStaff Six.One 90 with it 8PT HL and mostly I don't like the 1 pt HL and most
don't. I'd recommend getting it a size smaller, then using a heat sleeve to build up the grip size to increase it HL Balance
use a leather and some lead tape in the grip to make it balance better to your personal needs. I know it sounds like a lot
worth it. I love this racquet. 100% great racquet.
From: Anon, 1/13
Comments: This frame plays a lot like the Prestige Pro (any Youtek Version) but with more controllable power.
Great feel and touch, excellent plow through, wicked slices, and as much topspin capacity as you want. The only possible
negative for some might be the maneuverability, but if you are used to playing with 12-ounce frames, this won't be a
plays a lot like a 12-ouncer than the low 11's that it's listed at given the mass in the head. Awesome frame overall.
From: Jaspar, 1/13
String type and tension: polyester @ 55 lbs
Comments: It's easier to create pace with new Blade model and has better feel to me than past versions. I
to take fairly aggressive swings to rip the ball so keep that in mind, as there are lots of racquets that you don't. Great
spin/pace on serves and it is a really cool cosmetic. I would seriously consider this racquet if I could hit it with my own
up, but I still love my Tecnifibre TFight 295 strung with Red Code at 57lbs.
From: Rizza, 1/13
Comments: I loved the old BLX Blade, but having read that Wilson were bringing out a 16x19 version and
the TW review I've waited with great anticipation to finally get my hands on it. The Blade is renowned for its solid crisp feel
plenty of pop and plowthrough, but having tested out the new 2013 16x19 98 I can say it has none of these attributes. It
hollow, unstable and slightly muted. In fact, although it shares the same specs as the previous model, it simply doesn't
play like previous Blades. I'm hugely disappointed.
From: Steve, 1/13
Comments: I purchased one of each of the new Blades (18x20, 16x19 and 93) so that I could really decide
one I like best. This is my favorite. My only gripe is that the handle is too short to be comfortable for 2 handed
such a large number of competitive juniors playing with a 2 hander I'm not sure what Wilson was thinking. I really like the
plays and feels other than that. It's a great looking stick too and the quality seems better than the PD I switched from
seem to have a chronic issue with developing creeking handles, and the PD head guard durability is a joke). Also of note
16x19 Blade is that the L3 grip is shaped somewhat like a Head grip but the L2 feels closer (very symetricial) to that of a
racquet. Weird. I'm a 14 year old tournament player.
From: Austin, 12/12
Comments: I played with Blade 98 16x19 for the first time and for 3 hours today. I think it is a perfectly
racquet and expect it to be very popular among above average level club players. It's almost even balance after stringing,
good plowthrough and lively stringbed has impressed me. My serving needed an adjustment after my Pure Drive 2012 (with
of 2 grams of lead at 3 and 9) but was very consistent after several tries. Groundstroke drives were very impressive from
sides, achieving good depth. Volleys and overheads were also a breeze. This is a proper balanced stick with no gimmicks,
gives you back more or at least what you put into it. I have ordered the second one and will prefer it over my slightly
Pure Drive because of its thinner profile, enormous feedback and overall performance.
From: Teoman, 12/12
String type and tension: Babolat VS Gut mains / Luxilon ALU Rough crosses @ 57/53 lbs
Comments: It provides more spin than the 18x20 version, but it's unstable on off-center hits. It's a pretty
racquet from all areas of the court, but did I mention unstable?
From: Bryan, 11/12
Comments: I have demo'ed this racquet and it is amazing! I love the power, feel, and control I get from this
especially with the new Luxilon 4G string. It has such great bite and playability. The only thing I don't like is the length of
is difficult for me to hit a 2HBH without the frame hurting my left hand.
From: Anon, 11/12
String type and tension: Luxilon 4G @ 60 lbs